He did far too many stupid things to be brilliant, IMO. Politics is an arena where the mediocre can excel. He was a political manipulator, a sociopath, and a meglomanic. One manifestation of his meglomania was his refusal to let his generals conduct the battles because that would be conceding that someone knew more than he did.
Perhaps it's easier to think that he had to be brilliant to rise to power the way he did and to lead his nation into the depths of depravity. It's harder to accept that a former corporal and failed artist, someone not too different from an ordinary person, could do these things. It's kind of like those people who insist that a single mediocre individual could kill a president, but it happened more than once.
Current Events » in reply to Hitler was not a general, he was a demagogue, a brilliant one.
I'm not buying that Hitler was brilliant at all
The whole thread (51 posts)
- US Supreme Court upholds "Night and Fog"
- A Canadian weighs in on the comparison
- Yes, of course a mental midget jumps right in trying to compare Pres. Bush to Hitler
- Wow. Yet another Bush - Hitler comparison.
- Ah, my friend, you forget, or neglect - - -
- Leaving aside the Hitler comparison...
- Let's not leave the comparison aside just yet
- Is the slope really slippery
- re: Leaving aside the Hitler comparison...
- Bush IS the new Hitler......successful regimes are built on this
