90% ARE identified.
The US Air Force Condon report couldn't explain the rest, and the case histories are PHENOMENAL. That is a word that doesn't fit into your paradigm.
>"When I hear a noise in my back yard at night, I don't assume it's a koala bear, or a chupacabra."
Naturally, and neither would I. However, this condescending remark totally misses what I am trying to say. You see, as I've mentioned before, I have been a witness to many of these unexplained events.
That makes me hyper-sensitive to the possibilty of it myself. There have been countless things seen throughout history, some are even recorded in the Bible.
They liked to call them chariots of fire.
You said:
>"One of your problems is you never look below the capstone of the pyramid when observing phenomena. "
As far as my sightings went, there were other observers and the case is well documented and there is an unusual correlation of other events that lead to this, even until today. I don't expect to see the world from your eyes, why do you expect the same from mine?
Off Topic » in reply to Common sense, Lindy.
As publius always says "The one thing about common sense is that it is so uncommon".
The whole thread (69 posts)
- Tibetan Monks Remote View World's Dramatic Future
- How do people gain spiritual comfort from such doom and gloom bunk?
- 'Troubles ahead' is news? (n/t)
- "Remote viewing Tibetan monks see Extra Terrestrial powers saving the World from destroying itself in 2012"
- Why do you believe this nonsense? (n/t)
- re: Everyone believes in something and
- A large majority of the world's population believes "such nonsense"
- For the record...
- A large majority of the world's population is ignorant of Science (n/t)
- Fine, then: a majority of people in the world who are not ignorant of science believe such "nonsense". (n/t)
- False. Belief in such nonsense is apodictic proof of ignorance of Science. (n/t)
- You want to explain Einstein's religious beliefs to me? (n/t)
- Not sure Einstein could explain his own religious beliefs. ;) (n/t)
- Point: scientists can be Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, new agers, etc.
- Both points are true, but...
- Visions of Tibetan Monks are now "garbage"?
- Right! You wrote: "I'll bet this is garbage to you too. Because it's unverifiable." That MAKES it garbage.
- Yup.... see, you CAN learn, can't you?!
- Smart Ass
- You wrote: "Seeing as how the Vatican and many other religious followers have taken the Virgin Mary sightings at Medjugorje as a sign from the heavens, why do you have to make fun of it? Of them? Of…
- Ah, thus you must believe in ALL the vatican's teachings- otherwise you are equally dismissive of those that believe
- Smart Ass
- Anthropology is also a science
- Some guy said some other guys said... Sounds like the pastor in the church I live next door to. (n/t)
- Visions of Tibetan Monks are now "garbage"?
- Both points are true, but...
- Point: scientists can be Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, new agers, etc.
- Not sure Einstein could explain his own religious beliefs. ;) (n/t)
- You want to explain Einstein's religious beliefs to me? (n/t)
- False. Belief in such nonsense is apodictic proof of ignorance of Science. (n/t)
- Science?
- Fine, then: a majority of people in the world who are not ignorant of science believe such "nonsense". (n/t)
- Believe?
- typical loserville philosophy
- The invisible leprechauns living under my bed disagree...
- And what will happen when you let the Fairies come out of the closet? (n/t)
- leprechauns under the bed?
- As do the Biblical prophets...
