That sort of war is possible when the governments involved are of one form of autocracy or another, but just does not work for a democracy. That's a good thing, Tom.
"Us or them" of course. We have had a very few cases of that in the last few centuries. Notably, there was WWII and, after it was started, the American Civil War took on that character, maybe others if I thought about it further.
Other than that, our wars have been voluntary and were not required for our survival. Fans of those other wars, however, are always quick to point out our impending demise if we don't send an invasion force. Now we have folks like you who seem to identify another Hitler in another 3rd world country every year or so. Heck, if we gave Lee his way, we would put Mexico on the invasion short-list. Pardon my skepticism.
Flame » in reply to Military force
We are a democracy and therefore we will have no 100 Years War
The whole thread (45 posts)
- Visit from the Time Traveller.
- That reminds me of something....
- Eurabia, Dhimmitude, and the U.S. military
- Beautifully written
- Once again, may I offer for your consideration........
- Bull. The Blitzkreig didn't destroy the Brits will to resist and didn't break their spirit.......
- something definite to win
- re: The Blitzkreig didn't destroy the Brits will to resist.
- re: Beautifully written
