So what makes you think earth salting at this date would work in Iran? The article makes one good point that wars cannot be fought with Marquis of Queensbury rules. What a shame he didn't also make the point that you should never engage in a war without something definite to win.
When you are attacked, it is easy. Defeat and repulsion of the attacker. When you are the successful invader what the spoils of the war would be should have been acknowledged up front. In the case of Iraq, the American people have a right to ask, "What's in it for us?" A windfall for Halliburton stock isn't adequate.
The what's in it, has never been answered by this administration. But then, the excuse for going there has also been withheld to the judgement of history apparently. So the remaning unanswered question is when and how do we get out and rebuild?
Apparently it is going to take the next administration to answer the questions on the table. This administration doesn't seem to have a clue.
Publius
Flame » in reply to Beautifully written
Bull. The Blitzkreig didn't destroy the Brits will to resist and didn't break their spirit.......
The whole thread (45 posts)
- Visit from the Time Traveller.
- That reminds me of something....
- Eurabia, Dhimmitude, and the U.S. military
- Beautifully written
- Once again, may I offer for your consideration........
- Bull. The Blitzkreig didn't destroy the Brits will to resist and didn't break their spirit.......
- something definite to win
- re: The Blitzkreig didn't destroy the Brits will to resist.
- re: Beautifully written
