Time's coverage of the Vietnam Conflict

Flame » in reply to We didn't lose...we withdrew.

Time's coverage of the Vietnam Conflict

Alan G. Archer — 6/12/2006 1:02:10 PM (archived)

See the History of Time Magazine Part 4 and Part 5 by David Wallechinsky and Irving Wallace for a slightly more balanced view of the history of Time's Vietnam coverage.

David is drudging up on Current Events the old story of CNN withholding the reporting of stories from the field.

The whole thread (40 posts)

The Zarqawi Rorschach Test - Tom Brosz - 6/8/2006 4:27:21 PM
- quit the martyr act, Tom - R.L. - 6/11/2006 4:30:23 AM
  - That's not the point either. - Tom Brosz - 6/11/2006 1:20:55 PM
    - re: That's not the point either. - Robert - 6/11/2006 9:41:45 PM
      - you got me wrong - Bum Tosz - 6/12/2006 5:36:16 AM
      - We lost in Nam - tony - 6/11/2006 11:57:01 PM
        
        I don't think my side is the one reliving Vietnam in Iraq (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 6/12/2006 6:55:24 PM
        
        nooooooo, you've NEVER once referred to it in conjunction with Iraq - Tony - 6/12/2006 8:46:13 PM
        
        I've often mentioned the Left's obsession with reliving it. - Tom Brosz - 6/12/2006 10:56:50 PM
        
        Even when you're admitting it, you dont see it (n/t) - tony - 6/12/2006 11:07:47 PM
        
        But you don't see it either. - SDAI-Tech1 - 6/12/2006 11:26:43 PM
        
        If it were true, leave it to the wingers to jump to the explanation that requires a conspiracy. (n/t) - alcaray - 6/13/2006 3:27:36 PM
        
        only go back 5 years, 4 months and 22 days :-) - Tony - 6/13/2006 2:38:57 PM
        
        We didn't lose...we withdrew. - SDAI-Tech1 - 6/12/2006 1:01:45 AM
        
        Time's coverage of the Vietnam Conflict - Alan G. Archer - 6/12/2006 1:02:10 PM
        
        I rest my case - tony - 6/12/2006 10:40:21 AM
        
        If education is about brainwashing and control, who taught you to read? - Mary Anne - 6/12/2006 1:41:31 AM
        
        You don't want to know. - SDAI-Tech1 - 6/12/2006 3:20:20 AM
        
        As a brother of a teacher,... - Alan G. Archer - 6/12/2006 1:51:00 AM
        
        That's why it's on flame. - SDAI-Tech1 - 6/12/2006 3:03:34 AM
- What's missing from many of the news reports - sz - 6/9/2006 3:41:18 AM
- One down... - Donald - 6/9/2006 2:26:14 AM
- Page 2 of the test - alcaray - 6/8/2006 10:53:54 PM
- re: The Zarqawi Rorschach Test - SteveS - 6/8/2006 8:11:15 PM
- No BUT, but ALTHOUGH - Tony - 6/8/2006 7:18:20 PM
- re: The Zarqawi Rorschach Test - Tony - 6/8/2006 5:40:13 PM
- re: Did catching Saddam solve the problem? - Raoul - 6/8/2006 5:26:49 PM
  - No, But He Was Hiding Not Leading - ID - 6/8/2006 8:22:19 PM
- "This won't change anything." - Robert - 6/8/2006 5:13:08 PM
  - The actual point of the post... - Tom Brosz - 6/8/2006 10:47:12 PM
    - "What do you think will change with Zarqawi's death?" - Robert - 6/8/2006 11:46:17 PM
      - I don't know exactly what will happen. - Tom Brosz - 6/9/2006 7:09:54 AM
        
        re: I don't know exactly what will happen. - Robert - 6/9/2006 4:49:24 PM
  - re:Some changes - SteveS - 6/8/2006 8:23:57 PM
    - re: re:Some changes - Robert - 6/8/2006 11:36:48 PM
      - re: re:Some changes - SteveS - 6/9/2006 4:52:13 AM
        
        re: re:Some changes - Robert - 6/10/2006 6:11:55 PM
        
        re: re:Some changes - SteveS - 6/12/2006 1:12:35 PM
        
        re: re:Where's democracy? - Raoul - 6/12/2006 5:20:04 PM
        
        re: re:Coming down the pipeline - SteveS - 6/12/2006 8:43:02 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (40 posts)