Where did I say or imply Ds haven't been inappropriate?

Flame » in reply to A sanity check would be nice. Why don't you get on that right away?

Where did I say or imply Ds haven't been inappropriate?

Bowser — 10/6/2006 2:52:22 PM (archived)

The point was that if Kennedy or Clinton had been hustling little boys Hastert would have responded quite rapidly. Which is clearly true.

You're gonna have to help me understand how you managed to interpret my post as whitewashing Ds.

Arf

The whole thread (58 posts)

A rule of thumb. Sanity check. - Bowser - 10/6/2006 12:13:48 AM
- A sanity check would be nice. Why don't you get on that right away? - REB - 10/6/2006 2:21:14 PM
  - Where did I say or imply Ds haven't been inappropriate? - Bowser - 10/6/2006 2:52:22 PM
    - Where do you get off implying Hypocrisy is a Republican exclusive club? - REB - 10/6/2006 2:59:31 PM
      - Went dumpster-diving just for you REB. - alcaray - 10/7/2006 11:52:01 PM
        
        re: Went dumpster-diving just for you REB. - Hernando - 10/8/2006 3:55:21 AM
        
        are you familiar with the site? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/8/2006 4:26:52 AM
        
        Fair is fair... - ER - 10/8/2006 3:34:06 AM
        
        Oh my gosh, I did not catch that. - alcaray - 10/8/2006 3:43:48 AM
      - Why do you suppose I used the examples I did? - Bowser - 10/6/2006 5:15:44 PM
        
        Where have I once defended Hastert? - REB - 10/6/2006 5:42:36 PM
        
        "Bu - bu - bubut everybody does it!" That defence. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/6/2006 6:01:00 PM
        
        I am not arguing that. Whish! Over your head again. - REB - 10/6/2006 6:04:51 PM
        
        Hastert is R. Foley is R. Hastert (R) ignored Foley's (R) predations. - Bowser - 10/6/2006 11:58:03 PM
      - "My side is so morally superior to yours" - Robert - 10/6/2006 4:17:55 PM
        
        Factual correction - YetiMaster - 10/7/2006 5:35:25 AM
        
        10-4 (n/t) - Robert - 10/7/2006 4:50:40 PM
        
        re: "My side is so morally superior to yours" - REB - 10/6/2006 4:47:37 PM
        
        I understand that you are upset by this. - Mary Anne - 10/6/2006 5:38:17 PM
        
        re: I understand that you are upset by this. - REB - 10/6/2006 5:51:45 PM
        
        re: I understand that you are upset by this. - azstrummer - 10/6/2006 9:41:53 PM
        
        Almost... - Mary Anne - 10/7/2006 1:53:38 AM
        
        Some gouda, please - REB - 10/6/2006 9:55:44 PM
        
        ...and since we are on the topic. - REB - 10/6/2006 10:05:48 PM
        
        damnation by association - Robert - 10/7/2006 12:32:48 AM
        
        re: ...and since we are on the topic. - azstrummer - 10/6/2006 10:09:04 PM
        
        Never mind. You saw it. (n/t) - REB - 10/6/2006 10:08:38 PM
        
        ignoring is bliss - FrankC - 10/6/2006 7:57:36 PM
  - A good place to start - REB - 10/6/2006 2:30:43 PM
    - Interesting article - Mary Anne - 10/6/2006 3:46:01 PM
      - The Studds case is a more appropriate example IMO. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 6:16:52 PM
        
        Haven't looked up the Studds case, but have some opinions on your other comments. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2006 8:53:38 PM
        
        re: Haven't looked up the Studds case, but have some opinions on your other comments. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 11:09:39 PM
        
        14 - Mary Anne - 10/8/2006 12:38:39 AM
        
        re: 14 - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2006 10:20:37 PM
        
        OK. - Mary Anne - 10/9/2006 12:29:19 AM
        
        re: OK. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 2:22:34 AM
        
        Timing - Mary Anne - 10/9/2006 11:59:21 AM
        
        Timing is everything. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/9/2006 1:21:52 PM
        
        Why are you surprised? I work with kids. - Mary Anne - 10/9/2006 10:15:25 PM
        
        It looks as if Foley used the pages as a pool of young men to hook up with. - alcaray - 10/9/2006 4:09:15 PM
        
        The perks of power - Lindy - 10/10/2006 1:52:45 AM
        
        As the HZ Turns - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/8/2006 7:36:00 AM
        
        Pegged us - azstrummer - 10/10/2006 12:08:40 AM
        
        Impressions - Lindy - 10/10/2006 1:58:51 AM
        
        re: Impressions - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/10/2006 11:46:38 PM
        
        re: Impressions - Lindy - 10/11/2006 3:44:03 AM
        
        re: Impressions - azstrummer - 10/10/2006 6:50:11 PM
        
        I would definately forgo one hiking day..... - Lindy - 10/10/2006 9:54:42 PM
        
        Hysterical! - ER - 10/9/2006 9:00:28 PM
        
        Funny - Robert - 10/8/2006 5:57:30 PM
        
        Dangerous... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/9/2006 2:40:38 AM
        
        correction: no one ever sees anyone in an objective light (n/t) - alcaray - 10/9/2006 5:14:14 PM
        
        That's a hoot, Tech1 - Lindy - 10/8/2006 4:25:25 PM
        
        Thanks Lindy - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/9/2006 2:59:35 AM
      - Also Interesting. - REB - 10/6/2006 4:51:54 PM
        
        True. - Mary Anne - 10/6/2006 5:21:18 PM
      - re: Interesting article - REB - 10/6/2006 3:49:47 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (58 posts)