Factual correction

Flame » in reply to "My side is so morally superior to yours"

Factual correction

YetiMaster — 10/7/2006 5:35:25 AM (archived)

17 instead of 19 back then

Monica was, in fact, in her eraly 20's, I believe, when the first sexual encounter took place. The 19 number is a re-write of history done in the aftermath of the foley blow-up.

DL

The whole thread (58 posts)

A rule of thumb. Sanity check. - Bowser - 10/6/2006 12:13:48 AM
- A sanity check would be nice. Why don't you get on that right away? - REB - 10/6/2006 2:21:14 PM
  - Where did I say or imply Ds haven't been inappropriate? - Bowser - 10/6/2006 2:52:22 PM
    - Where do you get off implying Hypocrisy is a Republican exclusive club? - REB - 10/6/2006 2:59:31 PM
      - Went dumpster-diving just for you REB. - alcaray - 10/7/2006 11:52:01 PM
        
        re: Went dumpster-diving just for you REB. - Hernando - 10/8/2006 3:55:21 AM
        
        are you familiar with the site? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/8/2006 4:26:52 AM
        
        Fair is fair... - ER - 10/8/2006 3:34:06 AM
        
        Oh my gosh, I did not catch that. - alcaray - 10/8/2006 3:43:48 AM
      - Why do you suppose I used the examples I did? - Bowser - 10/6/2006 5:15:44 PM
        
        Where have I once defended Hastert? - REB - 10/6/2006 5:42:36 PM
        
        "Bu - bu - bubut everybody does it!" That defence. (n/t) - Bowser - 10/6/2006 6:01:00 PM
        
        I am not arguing that. Whish! Over your head again. - REB - 10/6/2006 6:04:51 PM
        
        Hastert is R. Foley is R. Hastert (R) ignored Foley's (R) predations. - Bowser - 10/6/2006 11:58:03 PM
      - "My side is so morally superior to yours" - Robert - 10/6/2006 4:17:55 PM
        
        Factual correction - YetiMaster - 10/7/2006 5:35:25 AM
        
        10-4 (n/t) - Robert - 10/7/2006 4:50:40 PM
        
        re: "My side is so morally superior to yours" - REB - 10/6/2006 4:47:37 PM
        
        I understand that you are upset by this. - Mary Anne - 10/6/2006 5:38:17 PM
        
        re: I understand that you are upset by this. - REB - 10/6/2006 5:51:45 PM
        
        re: I understand that you are upset by this. - azstrummer - 10/6/2006 9:41:53 PM
        
        Almost... - Mary Anne - 10/7/2006 1:53:38 AM
        
        Some gouda, please - REB - 10/6/2006 9:55:44 PM
        
        ...and since we are on the topic. - REB - 10/6/2006 10:05:48 PM
        
        damnation by association - Robert - 10/7/2006 12:32:48 AM
        
        re: ...and since we are on the topic. - azstrummer - 10/6/2006 10:09:04 PM
        
        Never mind. You saw it. (n/t) - REB - 10/6/2006 10:08:38 PM
        
        ignoring is bliss - FrankC - 10/6/2006 7:57:36 PM
  - A good place to start - REB - 10/6/2006 2:30:43 PM
    - Interesting article - Mary Anne - 10/6/2006 3:46:01 PM
      - The Studds case is a more appropriate example IMO. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 6:16:52 PM
        
        Haven't looked up the Studds case, but have some opinions on your other comments. - Mary Anne - 10/7/2006 8:53:38 PM
        
        re: Haven't looked up the Studds case, but have some opinions on your other comments. - Tom Brosz - 10/7/2006 11:09:39 PM
        
        14 - Mary Anne - 10/8/2006 12:38:39 AM
        
        re: 14 - Tom Brosz - 10/8/2006 10:20:37 PM
        
        OK. - Mary Anne - 10/9/2006 12:29:19 AM
        
        re: OK. - Tom Brosz - 10/9/2006 2:22:34 AM
        
        Timing - Mary Anne - 10/9/2006 11:59:21 AM
        
        Timing is everything. - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/9/2006 1:21:52 PM
        
        Why are you surprised? I work with kids. - Mary Anne - 10/9/2006 10:15:25 PM
        
        It looks as if Foley used the pages as a pool of young men to hook up with. - alcaray - 10/9/2006 4:09:15 PM
        
        The perks of power - Lindy - 10/10/2006 1:52:45 AM
        
        As the HZ Turns - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/8/2006 7:36:00 AM
        
        Pegged us - azstrummer - 10/10/2006 12:08:40 AM
        
        Impressions - Lindy - 10/10/2006 1:58:51 AM
        
        re: Impressions - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/10/2006 11:46:38 PM
        
        re: Impressions - Lindy - 10/11/2006 3:44:03 AM
        
        re: Impressions - azstrummer - 10/10/2006 6:50:11 PM
        
        I would definately forgo one hiking day..... - Lindy - 10/10/2006 9:54:42 PM
        
        Hysterical! - ER - 10/9/2006 9:00:28 PM
        
        Funny - Robert - 10/8/2006 5:57:30 PM
        
        Dangerous... - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/9/2006 2:40:38 AM
        
        correction: no one ever sees anyone in an objective light (n/t) - alcaray - 10/9/2006 5:14:14 PM
        
        That's a hoot, Tech1 - Lindy - 10/8/2006 4:25:25 PM
        
        Thanks Lindy - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/9/2006 2:59:35 AM
      - Also Interesting. - REB - 10/6/2006 4:51:54 PM
        
        True. - Mary Anne - 10/6/2006 5:21:18 PM
      - re: Interesting article - REB - 10/6/2006 3:49:47 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (58 posts)