No Steve, what it means is that, if you're going to have a discussion when nerves are raw, you don't start from the extreme end of the political spectrum. You ease into it with a bit of compassion instead of jumping at an opportunity to advance your narrow-minded ideology.
There's a huge difference between starting a discussion (as ER did) where you lay out your own uncertainties and internal struggle about an issue and posting a link to an article that clearly is meant to provoke the opposite side. I could care less if Tom had the best of intentions and firmly believed what he was posting. It clearly inflamed the passions of a lot of people on here and brought instant indignation from more than just me.
Our society becomes more and more crass and bullying every day and it's time we stood up to this form of borishness. If you look into Tom's responses since the outrage began you'll see not one word of atonement for the style. Maybe it's because guys like you keep coming to his defense. They call that in psychology an enabler.
Art
Flame » in reply to re:Does this mean the smoke has cleared?
re: re:Does this mean the smoke has cleared?
The whole thread (58 posts)
- Last year at Virginia Tech
- Here we go again...
- Gun control has been on my mind since this happened
- did you read the article? your headline is very wrong (n/t)
- No.
- Taking this to flame (n/t)
- Look around the world and ask yourself: why does it mainly happen in the US?
- Way to go, Tom. Really admirable. (n/t)
