From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says

Current Events » in reply to I followed up the first link on the 'BLOG' you sited (because we all know, BLOGS are the end-all-be-all of objective truth!)

From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says

REB — 4/30/2007 9:42:53 PM (archived)

You have a point about Blogs, but this one had links to some good sources for their claims.

Did you follow this link?

I noticed this news never really made it to the mainstream media.

As you can see, Saddam did have WMD that he was supposed to have destroyed.

The whole thread (52 posts)

No connnection - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 6:54:33 AM
- You guys have turned me around in less than a year... - ER - 4/30/2007 6:18:52 PM
  - re: And it only took us... - SteveS - 5/1/2007 3:42:07 AM
    - re: getting tired - Fox - 5/2/2007 3:30:16 AM
      - re: getting tired - SteveS - 5/2/2007 4:32:23 AM
    - Lies, half lies and apparent lies - FrankC - 5/1/2007 4:51:45 PM
  - re: You guys have turned me around in less than a year... - gbaikie - 5/1/2007 2:57:23 AM
    - I have a problem with..... - Lindy - 5/2/2007 12:04:05 AM
  - Truth, what a concept - azstrummer - 4/30/2007 8:05:17 PM
- Also the "No WMD" lie. - REB - 4/30/2007 3:47:24 PM
  - The Uranium... - Laurie Street - 4/30/2007 4:31:02 PM
  - I followed up the first link on the 'BLOG' you sited (because we all know, BLOGS are the end-all-be-all of objective truth!) - Yeti - 4/30/2007 4:13:53 PM
    - From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says - REB - 4/30/2007 9:42:53 PM
      - I followed and debunked 2 links as absolute bullshit. Laurie did another. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 12:15:17 AM
        
        When the Department of Denfense says that WMD have been found in Iraq, that is good enough for me. - REB - 5/1/2007 1:39:58 PM
        
        Then you have big problems. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 2:02:44 PM
        
        The Department of Defense is a valid source. - REB - 5/1/2007 2:17:40 PM
        
        They should be - azstrummer - 5/3/2007 9:51:56 PM
        
        Thanks Art. That is actually a decent post and has some good points. - REB - 5/4/2007 2:20:02 PM
        
        Rare letdown. Sorry (grin) - azstrummer - 5/4/2007 3:47:04 PM
        
        Is it worth it. - REB - 5/4/2007 5:52:55 PM
        
        Robert, we need an edit button so we can edit our posts. - REB - 5/4/2007 5:58:34 PM
        
        re: Rare letdown. Sorry (grin) - REB - 5/4/2007 4:04:54 PM
        
        Now, THATS funny. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 4:31:31 PM
        
        Do you have any valid evidence as to why the Department of Defense is not a valid source. - REB - 5/1/2007 4:51:10 PM
        
        Two words: Tillman and Lynch (n/t) - LS - 5/1/2007 6:15:31 PM
        
        My god: aside from the obvious you mean? - Yeti - 5/1/2007 5:03:23 PM
        
        Sorry, you personal opinion and feelings of the D of D does not count as evidence. - REB - 5/1/2007 5:13:50 PM
        
        And: "Defense Department Disavows Santorumâ€™s WMD Claims" - S - 5/2/2007 8:46:40 PM
        
        Interesting, but I'd bet real money on steep odds that it won't faze REB one bit. (n/t) - Yeti - 5/2/2007 9:31:22 PM
        
        re: evidence. - S - 5/2/2007 5:32:55 PM
    - More debunking - Yeti - 4/30/2007 4:24:23 PM
- give it up. Al Queda was everywhere except Iraq. - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 4/30/2007 2:24:09 PM
- Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - Robert - 4/28/2007 5:38:33 PM
  - re: Still in denial - SteveS - 4/30/2007 1:04:30 PM
    - Clairvoyance - ER - 4/30/2007 3:43:40 PM
      - re: Clairvoyance - SteveS - 5/1/2007 3:37:28 AM
      - re: Clairvoyance - TB - 4/30/2007 7:51:21 PM
        
        You're preaching to the choir. - ER - 4/30/2007 8:51:24 PM
        
        From Tenet's book - TB - 4/30/2007 8:36:13 PM
        
        "It was never a question of a known, imminent threat; it was about an unwillingness to risk surprise." - ER - 4/30/2007 8:56:09 PM
        
        I thought I heard him giggle right before his neck snapped. (n/t) - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 5/1/2007 1:25:37 PM
        
        So what were, and are, the alternatives? - TB - 4/30/2007 10:19:57 PM
        
        IE: Since I can't win this discussion within the parameters of reality- lets play make-believe (n/t) - Yeti - 5/3/2007 10:12:12 PM
        
        The entire Democratic Party is hoping nobody thinks about any of this. - TB - 5/4/2007 5:26:53 AM
  - re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - TB - 4/29/2007 2:09:49 AM
  - re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 9:14:39 PM
    - That's a pathetic reach. - Bowser - 4/28/2007 9:31:03 PM
      - re: That's a pathetic reach. - gbaikie - 4/29/2007 1:43:54 AM
  - Good work, Robert. - ER - 4/28/2007 6:05:42 PM
- Indeed! - Raoul - 4/28/2007 7:24:26 AM
  - re: Indeed! - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 10:26:02 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (52 posts)