Who is the head of the DOD, thats right, the Scty of Defense. Starting in 2001, line up the statements made by the Dept of Defense and the Scty of Defense and compare them to reality. If you can't hear the fat lady singing, it is not my problem.
Look- i'm done. Go spike the ball and do a victory dance, because I'm not playing this 'special olympics' of rehetoric where I try to show the willfully blind the visually obvious. Nothing I can ever show you, say to you, discuss with you or reason with you will ever cause you a moments doubt. Nothing that transpires in the real world will ever shake your faith. In every Social, political or cultural movement there are the parasitic types that can't let go, and were caught up because they were fundamentally unable to think for themselves. I suspect you to be one of them. Just like those 75 year old die hard communist English Lit professors rotting away in some broom-closet converted office pouring over Marx for the 10,000ndth time.
Yeti
Current Events » in reply to Do you have any valid evidence as to why the Department of Defense is not a valid source.
My god: aside from the obvious you mean?
The whole thread (52 posts)
- No connnection
- You guys have turned me around in less than a year...
- Also the "No WMD" lie.
- The Uranium...
- I followed up the first link on the 'BLOG' you sited (because we all know, BLOGS are the end-all-be-all of objective truth!)
- From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says
- I followed and debunked 2 links as absolute bullshit. Laurie did another.
- When the Department of Denfense says that WMD have been found in Iraq, that is good enough for me.
- I followed and debunked 2 links as absolute bullshit. Laurie did another.
- More debunking
- From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says
- give it up. Al Queda was everywhere except Iraq.
- Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty
- re: Still in denial
- re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty
- re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty
- Good work, Robert.
- Indeed!
