Look into the track record of information coming out of the DoD and the Scty of Defense about Iraq. What would a rational person conclude about the validity and political 'taint' of information from those sources.
Look into the '500 wepaons of mass destruction' thing. You'll find they were old cannon shells manufactured prior to 1991. They had not been 'stockpiled' in any meaningful way- IE, to preserve or maintain them for future use. They could not have been fired. The agents that they once held had leaked or degraded away to the point that they could not have been used as weapons. They were located, basically, in a discard pile. They were little more than an environmental hazard. Its extremely doubtful that the government of Saddam even knew of their existence.
Now. Watch Powells speach before the UN. Listen to just some of the claims made by the administration.
What would a rational objective person conclude?
Now- do tell me. How does it feel, to be such a sucker?
Yeti
Current Events » in reply to The Department of Defense is a valid source.
Now, THATS funny.
The whole thread (52 posts)
- No connnection
- You guys have turned me around in less than a year...
- Also the "No WMD" lie.
- The Uranium...
- I followed up the first link on the 'BLOG' you sited (because we all know, BLOGS are the end-all-be-all of objective truth!)
- From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says
- I followed and debunked 2 links as absolute bullshit. Laurie did another.
- When the Department of Denfense says that WMD have been found in Iraq, that is good enough for me.
- I followed and debunked 2 links as absolute bullshit. Laurie did another.
- More debunking
- From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says
- give it up. Al Queda was everywhere except Iraq.
- Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty
- re: Still in denial
- re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty
- re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty
- Good work, Robert.
- Indeed!
