Current Events » in reply to Clairvoyance

re: Clairvoyance

SteveS — 5/1/2007 3:37:28 AM (archived)

I can’t believe you are dismissing the evidence as trivial.
What was Saddam and al Qaeda supposed to do leave a laundry list of their activities. We haven’t even read through a millisecond of the documents yet. The fact that Saddam gave Zarqawi $300,000 out to tell someone something.
There are also investigative findings from the Food for Oil program that shows money was being diverted to al Qaeda through various companies.

And what about Tenet? He new al Qaeda and Saddam had ties during the Clinton years. “When you have been doing this as long as I have”

Feeling each other out? How many years does one need to feel each other out and how much money does one give to feel one out?

And if Saddam was so secular why did he change the Iraqi flag in 1991 from this:

To this:

Translation of text which is said to be in Saddam’s handwriting; God is Great
Plus at the same time he ordered thousands of Koran’s for his schools. Now I wonder why he did that.
Kinda blows the secular myth out the window.

Cherry picking the evidence is a good one.

WMD wasn’t even the soul reason for invading Iraq, and tell me why did we invade Afghanistan and kick the Taliban’s out? They didn’t attack us in 9/11.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (52 posts)

• No connnection - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 6:54:33 AM
  • You guys have turned me around in less than a year... - ER - 4/30/2007 6:18:52 PM
    • re: And it only took us... - SteveS - 5/1/2007 3:42:07 AM
      • re: getting tired - Fox - 5/2/2007 3:30:16 AM
        • re: getting tired - SteveS - 5/2/2007 4:32:23 AM
      • Lies, half lies and apparent lies - FrankC - 5/1/2007 4:51:45 PM
    • re: You guys have turned me around in less than a year... - gbaikie - 5/1/2007 2:57:23 AM
      • I have a problem with..... - Lindy - 5/2/2007 12:04:05 AM
    • Truth, what a concept - azstrummer - 4/30/2007 8:05:17 PM
  • Also the "No WMD" lie. - REB - 4/30/2007 3:47:24 PM
    • The Uranium... - Laurie Street - 4/30/2007 4:31:02 PM
    • I followed up the first link on the 'BLOG' you sited (because we all know, BLOGS are the end-all-be-all of objective truth!) - Yeti - 4/30/2007 4:13:53 PM
      • From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says - REB - 4/30/2007 9:42:53 PM
        • I followed and debunked 2 links as absolute bullshit. Laurie did another. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 12:15:17 AM
          • When the Department of Denfense says that WMD have been found in Iraq, that is good enough for me. - REB - 5/1/2007 1:39:58 PM
            • Then you have big problems. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 2:02:44 PM
              • The Department of Defense is a valid source. - REB - 5/1/2007 2:17:40 PM
                • They should be - azstrummer - 5/3/2007 9:51:56 PM
                  • Thanks Art. That is actually a decent post and has some good points. - REB - 5/4/2007 2:20:02 PM
                    • Rare letdown. Sorry (grin) - azstrummer - 5/4/2007 3:47:04 PM
                      • Is it worth it. - REB - 5/4/2007 5:52:55 PM
                        • Robert, we need an edit button so we can edit our posts. - REB - 5/4/2007 5:58:34 PM
                      • re: Rare letdown. Sorry (grin) - REB - 5/4/2007 4:04:54 PM
                • Now, THATS funny. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 4:31:31 PM
                  • Do you have any valid evidence as to why the Department of Defense is not a valid source. - REB - 5/1/2007 4:51:10 PM
                    • Two words: Tillman and Lynch (n/t) - LS - 5/1/2007 6:15:31 PM
                    • My god: aside from the obvious you mean? - Yeti - 5/1/2007 5:03:23 PM
                      • Sorry, you personal opinion and feelings of the D of D does not count as evidence. - REB - 5/1/2007 5:13:50 PM
                        • And: "Defense Department Disavows Santorum’s WMD Claims" - S - 5/2/2007 8:46:40 PM
                          • Interesting, but I'd bet real money on steep odds that it won't faze REB one bit. (n/t) - Yeti - 5/2/2007 9:31:22 PM
                        • re: evidence. - S - 5/2/2007 5:32:55 PM
      • More debunking - Yeti - 4/30/2007 4:24:23 PM
  • give it up. Al Queda was everywhere except Iraq. - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 4/30/2007 2:24:09 PM
  • Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - Robert - 4/28/2007 5:38:33 PM
    • re: Still in denial - SteveS - 4/30/2007 1:04:30 PM
      • Clairvoyance - ER - 4/30/2007 3:43:40 PM
        • re: Clairvoyance - SteveS - 5/1/2007 3:37:28 AM
        • re: Clairvoyance - TB - 4/30/2007 7:51:21 PM
          • You're preaching to the choir. - ER - 4/30/2007 8:51:24 PM
          • From Tenet's book - TB - 4/30/2007 8:36:13 PM
            • "It was never a question of a known, imminent threat; it was about an unwillingness to risk surprise." - ER - 4/30/2007 8:56:09 PM
              • I thought I heard him giggle right before his neck snapped. (n/t) - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 5/1/2007 1:25:37 PM
              • So what were, and are, the alternatives? - TB - 4/30/2007 10:19:57 PM
                • IE: Since I can't win this discussion within the parameters of reality- lets play make-believe (n/t) - Yeti - 5/3/2007 10:12:12 PM
                  • The entire Democratic Party is hoping nobody thinks about any of this. - TB - 5/4/2007 5:26:53 AM
    • re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - TB - 4/29/2007 2:09:49 AM
    • re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 9:14:39 PM
      • That's a pathetic reach. - Bowser - 4/28/2007 9:31:03 PM
        • re: That's a pathetic reach. - gbaikie - 4/29/2007 1:43:54 AM
    • Good work, Robert. - ER - 4/28/2007 6:05:42 PM
  • Indeed! - Raoul - 4/28/2007 7:24:26 AM
    • re: Indeed! - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 10:26:02 AM