Current Events » in reply to Do you have any valid evidence as to why the Department of Defense is not a valid source.

The whole thread (52 posts)

• No connnection - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 6:54:33 AM
  • You guys have turned me around in less than a year... - ER - 4/30/2007 6:18:52 PM
    • re: And it only took us... - SteveS - 5/1/2007 3:42:07 AM
      • re: getting tired - Fox - 5/2/2007 3:30:16 AM
        • re: getting tired - SteveS - 5/2/2007 4:32:23 AM
      • Lies, half lies and apparent lies - FrankC - 5/1/2007 4:51:45 PM
    • re: You guys have turned me around in less than a year... - gbaikie - 5/1/2007 2:57:23 AM
      • I have a problem with..... - Lindy - 5/2/2007 12:04:05 AM
    • Truth, what a concept - azstrummer - 4/30/2007 8:05:17 PM
  • Also the "No WMD" lie. - REB - 4/30/2007 3:47:24 PM
    • The Uranium... - Laurie Street - 4/30/2007 4:31:02 PM
    • I followed up the first link on the 'BLOG' you sited (because we all know, BLOGS are the end-all-be-all of objective truth!) - Yeti - 4/30/2007 4:13:53 PM
      • From the Department of Defense, June 29, 2006, "Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria" Official Says - REB - 4/30/2007 9:42:53 PM
        • I followed and debunked 2 links as absolute bullshit. Laurie did another. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 12:15:17 AM
          • When the Department of Denfense says that WMD have been found in Iraq, that is good enough for me. - REB - 5/1/2007 1:39:58 PM
            • Then you have big problems. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 2:02:44 PM
              • The Department of Defense is a valid source. - REB - 5/1/2007 2:17:40 PM
                • They should be - azstrummer - 5/3/2007 9:51:56 PM
                  • Thanks Art. That is actually a decent post and has some good points. - REB - 5/4/2007 2:20:02 PM
                    • Rare letdown. Sorry (grin) - azstrummer - 5/4/2007 3:47:04 PM
                      • Is it worth it. - REB - 5/4/2007 5:52:55 PM
                        • Robert, we need an edit button so we can edit our posts. - REB - 5/4/2007 5:58:34 PM
                      • re: Rare letdown. Sorry (grin) - REB - 5/4/2007 4:04:54 PM
                • Now, THATS funny. - Yeti - 5/1/2007 4:31:31 PM
                  • Do you have any valid evidence as to why the Department of Defense is not a valid source. - REB - 5/1/2007 4:51:10 PM
                    • Two words: Tillman and Lynch (n/t) - LS - 5/1/2007 6:15:31 PM
                    • My god: aside from the obvious you mean? - Yeti - 5/1/2007 5:03:23 PM
                      • Sorry, you personal opinion and feelings of the D of D does not count as evidence. - REB - 5/1/2007 5:13:50 PM
                        • And: "Defense Department Disavows Santorum’s WMD Claims" - S - 5/2/2007 8:46:40 PM
                          • Interesting, but I'd bet real money on steep odds that it won't faze REB one bit. (n/t) - Yeti - 5/2/2007 9:31:22 PM
                        • re: evidence. - S - 5/2/2007 5:32:55 PM
      • More debunking - Yeti - 4/30/2007 4:24:23 PM
  • give it up. Al Queda was everywhere except Iraq. - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 4/30/2007 2:24:09 PM
  • Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - Robert - 4/28/2007 5:38:33 PM
    • re: Still in denial - SteveS - 4/30/2007 1:04:30 PM
      • Clairvoyance - ER - 4/30/2007 3:43:40 PM
        • re: Clairvoyance - SteveS - 5/1/2007 3:37:28 AM
        • re: Clairvoyance - TB - 4/30/2007 7:51:21 PM
          • You're preaching to the choir. - ER - 4/30/2007 8:51:24 PM
          • From Tenet's book - TB - 4/30/2007 8:36:13 PM
            • "It was never a question of a known, imminent threat; it was about an unwillingness to risk surprise." - ER - 4/30/2007 8:56:09 PM
              • I thought I heard him giggle right before his neck snapped. (n/t) - The Artist formerly known as Scott Evil - 5/1/2007 1:25:37 PM
              • So what were, and are, the alternatives? - TB - 4/30/2007 10:19:57 PM
                • IE: Since I can't win this discussion within the parameters of reality- lets play make-believe (n/t) - Yeti - 5/3/2007 10:12:12 PM
                  • The entire Democratic Party is hoping nobody thinks about any of this. - TB - 5/4/2007 5:26:53 AM
    • re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - TB - 4/29/2007 2:09:49 AM
    • re: Another breakdown of the time-binding faculty - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 9:14:39 PM
      • That's a pathetic reach. - Bowser - 4/28/2007 9:31:03 PM
        • re: That's a pathetic reach. - gbaikie - 4/29/2007 1:43:54 AM
    • Good work, Robert. - ER - 4/28/2007 6:05:42 PM
  • Indeed! - Raoul - 4/28/2007 7:24:26 AM
    • re: Indeed! - gbaikie - 4/28/2007 10:26:02 AM