Did you even bother to READ the post before replying with this caustic nonsense? Apparently not, as I see nothing substantive in your reply.
I offered the news item for general consumption, and additionally offered several other observations and opinions with specific references.
If you take umbrage with a specific point I've made, please address it technically, without name-calling and other uncalled-for ranting. Quite unscientific, though typical of the quality of discussion online, unfortunately.
Can we possibly discuss the issues rationally, without bringing apparent emotional knee-jerk reactions into the picture or screaming that the sky is falling?
I also see no reason why this post should have been moved out of the space section, as it specifically addresses physical observations of the sun and raises pointed technical issues requiring redress. I respectfully request that it be moved back, as it is NOT off-topic (vituperous comments from ARRELL, aside). Thank you.
Regards,
~Michael Gmirkin
Off Topic » in reply to Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
re: Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
The whole thread (81 posts)
- Polar Crown Prominences Raise Questions About Overly Simplistic "Magnetic" Solar Theories...
- Knowing is half the battle! The other half is knowing the "right" things...
- Knowing is half the battle! The other half is knowing the "right" things... (SCIENCE talk)
- Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
- re: Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
- You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense...
- Until we change the rules or untill Robert release HZII, any number of nuts are welcome on offtopic. (n/t)
- re: You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense...
- You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense...
- moved (n/t)
- re: moved
- We have rules
- "Since the original post was intended to engender a rational scientific discussion of the issues " No, it wasnt....
- Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- re: Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- "Hopefully we can actually talk like human beings?"
- The Sun.
- Bzzzzzzzz.
- LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves...
- re: LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves...
- re: LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves...
- You won't be happy till it's move to flame? (n/t)
- My point precisely...
- A number of us on this board can guarantee that ARRELL is not Joshua Schroeder.
- Okay. :)
- However Michael...
- re: However Michael...
- Jody, its not 'pseudoskepticism'.... Its about knowing what one is talking about...
- re:pseudoskeptic, RL to T :-) (n/t)
- However Michael...
- Okay. :)
- A number of us on this board can guarantee that ARRELL is not Joshua Schroeder.
- My point precisely...
- re: Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- Minor typo...
- re: moved
- re: Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
