Your assumptin would be wrong

Off Topic » in reply to Rules are great!

Your assumptin would be wrong

Lindy — 9/19/2008 10:59:37 PM (archived)

>"I also assume that some of the rules includes decorum, assumption of good faith and not yelling "fire" in a crowded building to engender a panic... Just because someone screams pseudoscience, doesn't make it so."

I get your point.

The whole thread (81 posts)

Polar Crown Prominences Raise Questions About Overly Simplistic "Magnetic" Solar Theories... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 1:47:40 PM
- Knowing is half the battle! The other half is knowing the "right" things... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 6:11:57 PM
  - Hitting the 'reset' button. SCIENCE talk, please! - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 6:21:14 PM
    - ARRELL: E&M are not new. Agreed! But my statement was true, I assume? - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 9:07:21 PM
      - Sigh- ok, here we go.... - ARRELL - 9/22/2008 5:51:50 AM
        
        Thanks! A few interesting tidbits in there. :) - Michael Gmirkin - 9/23/2008 7:26:58 AM
        
        Until you look into the physics and educate yourself on this, discussion is pointless... - ARRELL - 9/23/2008 4:48:33 PM
        
        And yet... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/26/2008 2:06:24 AM
- Knowing is half the battle! The other half is knowing the "right" things... (SCIENCE talk) - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 6:06:07 PM
- Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage - ARRELL - 9/19/2008 2:05:25 PM
  - re: Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 3:16:30 PM
    - You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense... - ARRELL - 9/19/2008 4:29:31 PM
      - Until we change the rules or untill Robert release HZII, any number of nuts are welcome on offtopic. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/19/2008 9:34:26 PM
        
        No, As long as we ignore the rules, any number of nuts are welcome on offtopic. - ARRELL - 9/20/2008 1:48:02 PM
        
        Hence the name, "Off Topic", aka, "not science". - Mary Anne, sometime moderator - 9/22/2008 1:18:53 AM
        
        That quote was created before the offtopic board, I think. - alcaray - 9/20/2008 8:41:07 PM
        
        "That quote was created before the offtopic board,"- no, it wasn't - ARRELL - 9/24/2008 8:40:12 PM
        
        Then only my second sentence pertains. - alcaray - 9/24/2008 9:17:38 PM
        
        No matter how you look at it, - ARRELL - 9/24/2008 9:23:33 PM
        
        Unacceptable on Space, I agree. - alcaray - 9/24/2008 9:47:25 PM
        
        The Mods are quite aware of it, thank you - Space Moderator Nick - 9/25/2008 11:00:20 PM
        
        Normal folks, too, I assume... =oP - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 11:06:01 PM
      - re: You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 6:12:09 PM
  - moved (n/t) - modpod - 9/19/2008 2:45:44 PM
    - re: moved - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 4:07:40 PM
      - We have rules - alcaray - 9/19/2008 8:22:16 PM
        
        Rules are great! - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 9:41:32 PM
        
        Your assumptin would be wrong - Lindy - 9/19/2008 10:59:37 PM
        
        Get it? Got it! Good... ;) - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 11:43:52 PM
      - "Since the original post was intended to engender a rational scientific discussion of the issues " No, it wasnt.... - ARRELL - 9/19/2008 4:34:27 PM
        
        Angry much? Geez... Lighten up! - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 6:43:41 PM
        
        re: Angry much? Geez... Lighten up! - Johannes - 9/20/2008 12:53:45 AM
        
        RE: explanation / flame war. Probably neither is necessary. ;) - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 3:41:12 PM
        
        re:Significant nuances or trivia. - Johannes - 9/21/2008 10:21:55 PM
        
        Straight answers... I like it! Thanks. - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 3:28:44 PM
        
        "Hopefully we can actually talk like human beings?" - Lindy. - 9/19/2008 11:03:21 PM
        
        Nobody wants to debate ARRELL? - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 11:23:58 PM
        
        The Sun. - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/19/2008 7:36:11 PM
        
        Bzzzzzzzz. - ER - 9/20/2008 11:42:01 AM
        
        What is reality? - REB - 9/23/2008 8:35:40 PM
        
        re: What is reality? - Johannes - 9/25/2008 12:41:28 AM
        
        It's not all it's cracked up to be. - ER - 9/24/2008 1:29:28 AM
        
        To Bee or not to Bee. - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/21/2008 12:36:35 AM
        
        I'm sorry I brought it up. (n/t) - ER - 9/21/2008 3:43:36 AM
        
        Most are. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/21/2008 5:08:33 AM
        
        That should have been longer. (n/t) - alcaray - 9/21/2008 12:45:42 AM
        
        I can be brief when need be. ;-) (n/t) - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/21/2008 1:03:41 AM
        
        Long ago I came to the conclusion that even he doesn't believe what he is saying.... - ARRELL - 9/20/2008 12:44:47 PM
        
        LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves... - ARRELL - 9/19/2008 7:56:13 PM
        
        re: LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves... - Micihael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 9:47:32 PM
        
        re: LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves... - Betterman - 9/19/2008 9:26:38 PM
        
        If we're placing bets... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 11:00:37 PM
        
        You won't be happy till it's move to flame? (n/t) - alcaray - 9/19/2008 8:24:48 PM
        
        My point precisely... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 9:55:48 PM
        
        A number of us on this board can guarantee that ARRELL is not Joshua Schroeder. - alcaray - 9/19/2008 10:01:09 PM
        
        Okay. :) - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 11:19:07 PM
        
        However Michael... - Jody - 9/20/2008 12:08:11 AM
        
        re: However Michael... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 3:46:11 PM
        
        Jody, its not 'pseudoskepticism'.... Its about knowing what one is talking about... - ARRELL - 9/20/2008 1:26:29 AM
        
        Indeed... - Jody - 9/20/2008 2:36:25 AM
        
        Oh, he's that guy? - alcaray - 9/20/2008 2:03:03 AM
        
        re:pseudoskeptic, RL to T :-) (n/t) - Johannes - 9/20/2008 1:03:38 AM
        
        1) That's not accurate at all. - alcaray - 9/20/2008 1:21:56 AM
        
        Pseudoskeptical tendencies... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 5:04:46 PM
        
        re: Pseudoskeptical tendencies... - alcaray - 9/21/2008 7:22:54 PM
        
        Opinion noted. - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 8:25:28 PM
        
        Re: Pseudoskeptical tendencies... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/21/2008 8:17:12 PM
        
        Not at all. - alcaray - 9/21/2008 9:28:03 PM
        
        Disagreed. - Michael Gmirkin - 10/1/2008 7:09:43 PM
        
        Try the ***** carburetor! - Betterman - 9/23/2008 7:29:07 AM
        
        1) Thanks - ARRELL - 9/20/2008 4:10:42 AM
        
        re: 1) Thanks - TB - 9/21/2008 1:48:47 AM
        
        "Now you know how I feel about political and economic issues around here!" - Given that you have been demonstrably wrong over and over... - ARRELL - 9/21/2008 3:43:06 AM
        
        Whoa...smacked a ganglion there, didn't I? (n/t) - TB - 9/21/2008 5:16:53 AM
        
        "Whoa...smacked a ganglion there, didn't I?"- You have one to smack? - ARRELL - 9/21/2008 1:31:37 PM
        
        Oh fer crissakes ARRELL - Jody - 9/21/2008 2:37:01 PM
        
        "Crashing halt" - TB - 9/21/2008 8:41:12 PM
        
        OMG TB!! - Jody - 9/21/2008 2:42:35 AM
        
        re: OMG!! - TB - 9/21/2008 5:13:18 AM
        
        re: Angry much? Geez... Lighten up! - ARRELL - 9/19/2008 7:20:27 PM
      - Minor typo... - Michael Gmirkin - 9/19/2008 4:16:48 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (81 posts)