My answer is YES to all your questions so far. (And answer to Laurie)
1) “assessing that magnetic fields arise from electric currents�
YES I have not seen or read any evidence anywhere that would prove that the movement (current) of electrons can be excluded from magnetic effects.
2) “are magnetic field strengths dependent on the magnitude of the source current�
YES I have not seen or read any evidence anywhere that would prove otherwise.
3) “is the magnetic field topology dependent upon the strength + direction of the current�
YES I have not seen or read any evidence anywhere that would prove otherwise.
Sorry I do not have the time to explain my understanding of the phenomenon at this moment.
Perhaps another time.
Also, I do not have time for a flame war with RL.
____________________________________________________
To Laurie Street if you are reading this.
You were right.
I obtained the same quantity as you did to the question of the amount of energy that the total annihilation of 2 protons would create.
I used the formula E=(u/k)C to figure it out.
Off Topic » in reply to Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
re: Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
The whole thread (81 posts)
- Polar Crown Prominences Raise Questions About Overly Simplistic "Magnetic" Solar Theories...
- Knowing is half the battle! The other half is knowing the "right" things...
- Knowing is half the battle! The other half is knowing the "right" things... (SCIENCE talk)
- Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
- re: Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
- You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense...
- Until we change the rules or untill Robert release HZII, any number of nuts are welcome on offtopic. (n/t)
- re: You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense...
- You are taking a press release, and dishonestly implying that it lends creedence to your 'electric sun' nonsense...
- moved (n/t)
- re: moved
- We have rules
- "Since the original post was intended to engender a rational scientific discussion of the issues " No, it wasnt....
- Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- re: Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- "Hopefully we can actually talk like human beings?"
- The Sun.
- Bzzzzzzzz.
- LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves...
- re: LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves...
- re: LOL- there you go! The 'peer' review it deserves...
- You won't be happy till it's move to flame? (n/t)
- My point precisely...
- A number of us on this board can guarantee that ARRELL is not Joshua Schroeder.
- Okay. :)
- However Michael...
- re: However Michael...
- Jody, its not 'pseudoskepticism'.... Its about knowing what one is talking about...
- re:pseudoskeptic, RL to T :-) (n/t)
- However Michael...
- Okay. :)
- A number of us on this board can guarantee that ARRELL is not Joshua Schroeder.
- My point precisely...
- re: Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- Angry much? Geez... Lighten up!
- Minor typo...
- re: moved
- re: Delete or move Gmirkin Garbage
