Good God.
Buck is trying to tie deficits to higher employment. He is using the New Deal as an example, with one basic anomalous data point to prove it, in order to bolster the theory that Obama's huge deficits are going to create economic growth.
The graph, which I assumed to be self-explanatory, blows this theory to hell since we can see many places where unemployment goes up as deficits go up, and down as they go down.
Buck's hypothesis is a load of shit. Any questions?
