On one hand, almost all professionals who do some kind of "repairs" for a living are paid by the procedure. On the other hand, there are certainly professionals who do that kind of work for a steady salary (a serviceman contracted to, say, a hotel.)
Of course, this could produce an incentive to do fewer procedures. Some salesmen work on commissions. Others work on salaries. Many have combinations of both (your "bonus" concept?)
All forms of health insurance, government or private, have to have some kind of governor on payments. If we've decided it isn't going to be market forces (something that's becoming true even in the private insurance industry) we will have to use rationing. All health care systems around the world are dealing with trying to hold down costs in the face of the inevitable ever-increasing demands for "free" goods (in recent years, much of this has been in drugs and medicines). Most are simply restricting services or imposing price controls.
There will always be some bureaucracy needed to make sure health care money is being well-spent. I'm not convinced that a government bureaucracy is going to be better at it, or wind up cheaper, than a private system. The core premise of those advocating government medical care is that the government can do it cheaper and more efficiently, while providing the same care.
I may be cynical, but I have seen no other category, no other government-run function, where this has been true.
You make a good point that Medicare-type coverage for younger groups will not be as expensive per person. I have studied Canada's system in great depth, and while their average health care spending per capita is around $5,000 (Canadian), it's only $3700 per person between infancy and the age of 64. It goes up drastically for seniors: $5,369 for
age group 65 to 69, $7,382 for 70 to 74, $9,987 for 75 to 79 and $17,121 (!) for age
80 and older.
Flame » in reply to Actually, I doubt they'll take my advice
An interesting idea.
The whole thread (94 posts)
- Will any of you participate in any teabagging tomorrow?
- A summary of all the teabagging
- A slightly less hysterical summary
- Thank You Tom. I appreciate it.
- Wow! I hope nobody confuses non-mainstream with non-biased.
- And the teabaggers are protesting...What? A 3% rise in the tax rate for millionaires?
- I keep on channeling this image of Daffy Duck...
- Most of them are protesting the tax cuts they got. Unwittingly because they still believe the big lies from the election. (n/t)
- re: And the teabaggers are protesting...What?
- The difference in those numbers
- A bullshit graph from a bullshit source.
- re: source is the CBO
- That's funny, the link says Pajamas media
- Foul
- Republicans are not even trying to offer serious solutions to the nation's problems
- Yeah they are. They've essentially been shut down in Washington.
- Proving my point
- Well...
- Shouldn't GDP be roughly proportional to employment?
- New Deal Unemployment stats
- You have an odd definition of success.
- That is what et is talking about
- You have an odd definition of success.
- Well...
- Proving my point
- My Solution
- If everything we hear is the truth...you are correct Buck. (n/t)
- Yeah they are. They've essentially been shut down in Washington.
- That's funny, the link says Pajamas media
- re: source is the CBO
- A slightly less hysterical summary
- I would love to protest the Bailouts.
- Nope...I drink my tea...hot and straight....
- She's laughing because she probably knows what "teabagging" means in online gameplay.
- I don't know what it means in online gameplay.
- Is that anything like roleplay?...heh
- Found it. It was ABC.
- Conservatives are not opposed to deficits.
- You nailed it. (n/t)
- Deficits are only a problem to Conservatives when discussing social programs.
- It's OK to have deficits to kill people, just not so that OUR people can live. (n/t)
- Most government spending is social programs
- This one is.
- Amen!
- Conservatives are not opposed to deficits.
- I don't know what it means in online gameplay.
- Teabagging in Tricorns
- A summary of all the teabagging
