Or approaching the age where they expect to collect it.
The right has been conducting a propaganda campaign to discredit social security for years, we're constantly being told how it is on the verge of collapsing, while simultaneously any effort to fix it in congress is bitterly resisted. There are several reasons for this.
The well-to do don't feel they need it, so they resist paying for it, even though they pay a proportionally smaller fraction of their income into the system (due to the wage cutoff) than the poor do. Secondly, they see the amount of money going into government Social Security coffers as money that is inaccessible to the private sector as either consumer spending or investment capital.
But most of all, the idea that the working class has some independent protection in their old age against infirmity or catastrophe, and some income they can count on in their old age, makes them that much less dependent on washing someone else's car, shining someone else's shoes, or polishing someone else's balls, until they croak.
Flame » in reply to Then where is your "loss of confidence" information coming from?
Ask anyone on Social Security.
The whole thread (94 posts)
- Will any of you participate in any teabagging tomorrow?
- A summary of all the teabagging
- A slightly less hysterical summary
- Thank You Tom. I appreciate it.
- Wow! I hope nobody confuses non-mainstream with non-biased.
- And the teabaggers are protesting...What? A 3% rise in the tax rate for millionaires?
- I keep on channeling this image of Daffy Duck...
- Most of them are protesting the tax cuts they got. Unwittingly because they still believe the big lies from the election. (n/t)
- re: And the teabaggers are protesting...What?
- The difference in those numbers
- A bullshit graph from a bullshit source.
- re: source is the CBO
- That's funny, the link says Pajamas media
- Foul
- Republicans are not even trying to offer serious solutions to the nation's problems
- Yeah they are. They've essentially been shut down in Washington.
- Proving my point
- Well...
- Shouldn't GDP be roughly proportional to employment?
- New Deal Unemployment stats
- You have an odd definition of success.
- That is what et is talking about
- You have an odd definition of success.
- Well...
- Proving my point
- My Solution
- If everything we hear is the truth...you are correct Buck. (n/t)
- Yeah they are. They've essentially been shut down in Washington.
- That's funny, the link says Pajamas media
- re: source is the CBO
- A slightly less hysterical summary
- I would love to protest the Bailouts.
- Nope...I drink my tea...hot and straight....
- She's laughing because she probably knows what "teabagging" means in online gameplay.
- I don't know what it means in online gameplay.
- Is that anything like roleplay?...heh
- Found it. It was ABC.
- Conservatives are not opposed to deficits.
- You nailed it. (n/t)
- Deficits are only a problem to Conservatives when discussing social programs.
- It's OK to have deficits to kill people, just not so that OUR people can live. (n/t)
- Most government spending is social programs
- This one is.
- Amen!
- Conservatives are not opposed to deficits.
- I don't know what it means in online gameplay.
- Teabagging in Tricorns
- A summary of all the teabagging
