Ed yet again does not respond to a single point

Flame » in reply to Re: Another easy one...

Ed yet again does not respond to a single point

phil — 7/26/2001 6:25:57 PM (archived)

Fact: it would NOT have attained the flight test objective of hypersonic speeds. Your design engineer reference is bogus because it's old. That was the OBJECTIVE of the program. Lock-Mart themselves admitted that if the X-33 ever flew it was way too heavy to meet the flight parameters that were the goals of the X program - test of the heat shield at hypersonic high heating speeds. It got fat & heavy because of the hydrogen tank fiasco. Became a program that after 3 years needed another 3 years to do the original program. Another Goldin presided failure for his cirriculum vitae.

You need to do a fact update once every 2-3 years. Your X-33 response was outdated.
So far you have not responded directly to a single point in my factual criticism of Goldin.
Could it be because my examples are valid arguements?

The whole thread (40 posts)

Very Confused CCNet Author - Mark Eby - 7/25/2001 6:34:20 PM
- I already had a poke at him - Gary - 7/25/2001 7:16:18 PM
  - Fact is, Gary - E.P. Grondine - 7/25/2001 5:34:12 PM
    - (tech support) - Robert - 7/26/2001 2:11:32 PM
  - as well you should - phil - 7/25/2001 8:24:38 AM
    - What would phil have done? - E.P. Grondine - 7/25/2001 6:07:33 PM
      - Thanks for asking - phil - 7/26/2001 12:45:06 PM
        
        Let's start with CATS - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 4:01:48 PM
        
        Meowf! - phil - 7/26/2001 5:06:41 PM
        
        Arrrff, Arrffff - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 5:27:15 PM
        
        Dear Mark - - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 1:26:27 PM
        
        (tech support) - Robert - 7/26/2001 2:10:13 PM
        
        Re: (tech support) - E.P. Grondine - 7/27/2001 7:09:39 PM
        
        Forgot to mention Goldin' s X-33 $1B Fiasco - phil - 7/26/2001 1:43:41 PM
        
        Another easy one... - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 4:08:48 PM
        
        Re: Another easy one... - phil - 7/26/2001 4:58:21 PM
        
        Re: Another easy one... - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 5:37:54 PM
        
        Ed yet again does not respond to a single point - phil - 7/26/2001 6:25:57 PM
        
        Let' see if it's working now - E.P. Grondine - 7/27/2001 7:05:11 PM
        
        (tech support) - Robert - 7/26/2001 2:28:50 PM
        
        test - test - 7/26/2001 2:14:53 PM
        
        Hey? You 'wake? - Robert - 7/26/2001 2:17:22 PM
- Who are you trying to BS, Eby? - E.P. Grondine - 7/25/2001 5:44:38 PM
  - That's BS Expose EP - Mark Eby - 7/26/2001 12:34:52 PM
    - Dear Mark - - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 1:26:27 PM
      - (tech support) - Robert - 7/26/2001 2:10:13 PM
        
        Re: (tech support) - E.P. Grondine - 7/27/2001 7:09:39 PM
- Re: Very Confused CCNet Author - Dr. Impact - 7/25/2001 10:25:23 AM
  - Speaking about anonymous slurs - E.P. Grondine - 7/25/2001 5:28:22 PM
    - Re: Speaking about anonymous slurs - Dr. Impact - 7/25/2001 5:32:33 PM
      - The masked crusader strikes again - E.P. Grondine - 7/25/2001 5:48:38 PM
        
        Re: The masked crusader strikes again - Dr. Impact - 7/26/2001 2:41:27 PM
        
        Pop quiz, Masked One - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 2:59:29 PM
        
        Re: Pop quiz, Masked One - Dr. Impact - 7/26/2001 3:55:09 PM
        
        Dear Bloated and Pretentious Lying sack of sh*t, - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 4:28:50 PM
        
        Re: Dear Bloated and Pretentious Lying sack of sh*t, - Dr. Impact - 7/26/2001 4:40:59 PM
        
        You don't have any co-workers, you Lying sack of sh*t, - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 5:01:01 PM
        
        Re: You don't have any co-workers, you Lying sack of sh*t, - Dr. Impact - 7/26/2001 5:10:15 PM
        
        Oh yeah, Masked One - E.P. Grondine - 7/26/2001 5:20:52 PM
        
        Hey? You 'wake? - Robert - 7/26/2001 2:17:22 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (40 posts)