The tone was somewhat confrontational but mild compared to some of the invective and bitter sarcasm used by certain liberals on this board.
However, I don't think this was Mark's first engagement with Raoul and I assume that he (like me) has had questions, better framed, left unanswered. This creates frustration.
When, if ever, do you press the issue with a voluntary participant and why should we mince words other than to leave out personal insults and profanity? While his reply was blunt, I feel certain there was no intent by Mark to attack Raoul. If Mark's style is too intimidating for Raoul, he should ignore his comments from the get-go instead of answering with a comment that, by your interpretation, is equally as insulting (or non-insulting).
After all these years, shouldn't we understand each other better.
Flame » in reply to No, it works this way: attention to pronouns, among other things.
I don't disagree
The whole thread (48 posts)
- Balance
- re: Balance
- Tell me about it. . .
- Sorta like mugging a Girl Scout and then buying some cookies?
- re: Yeah , Balance
- When Has The UN Succeeded At A Tough Task?
- At the moment, it looks like they did a pretty good job of disarming Saddam (n/t)
- re: Ok, fine, Great!
- re: Polio, smallpox and childhood immunizations
- You Correctly Admitted This Was Beside The Point
- P.S. Have you been following my CE posts on the U.N.? (n/t)
- Not really relevant to this argument.
- Herdin' cats.
- re: Yeah , Balance (n/t)
- re: Yeah , Balance (n/t)
- When Has The UN Succeeded At A Tough Task?
- How about not having suppressed the photos of the dead of 911?
- probably wouldn't make much difference
