They also tend to underestimate the market potential for movies that don't insult people's religion, as in "The Passion of the Christ." Gibson made the movie with his own money and had a hard time getting anyone to distribute it. It made several hundred million at the box office. Meanwhile, several Hollywood "art" movies may cost upwards of $100 million and flop. A good percentage of the time, it seems ego rather than marketing drives the movie business. Some, like "Get Shorty" are dreadful crap that's nothing more than a collection of insider jokes. What made them think many people wanted to see that, which was your original point when you claimed "Hollywood makes what people will pay to see."
Current Events » in reply to Are you serious? I suspect not.
Hollywood often makes movies that are absolute stinkers
The whole thread (46 posts)
- Hollywood preparing massive anti-Bush siege
- cheap-film-wise, I think lots of folks are drooling over F911's success
- Hollywood makes what people will pay to see. Capitalism at work.
- Movie Title: Kerry's long war...Now that's funny
- Oh... the Evil
- 2 tours of duty Scott. Try to keep up. (n/t)
- re: You can't be serious...
- OKaaaay
- Not all 'tours of duty' are created equal
- You just insulted pretty much a whole Navy-full of Viet Nam Vets (n/t)
- OK
- You forgot Christmas in Cambodia ;-)
- Not all 'tours of duty' are created equal
- OKaaaay
- re: 2 tours of duty
- re: You can't be serious...
- "Then there's the media, which has dedicated itself to a Kerry victory." should be "Then there's the media, which have dedicated themselves to a Kerry victory."
