Current Events » in reply to Hollywood often makes movies that are absolute stinkers

The whole thread (46 posts)

• Hollywood preparing massive anti-Bush siege - Tom Brosz - 8/17/2004 4:28:35 PM
  • cheap-film-wise, I think lots of folks are drooling over F911's success - alcaray - 8/18/2004 9:27:05 PM
  • Hollywood makes what people will pay to see. Capitalism at work. - Bowser - 8/17/2004 7:24:38 PM
    • If that's the case, then explain 'Gigli', 'Reds', 'Ishtar' and a host of others - Larry J - 8/17/2004 10:01:47 PM
      • Are you serious? I suspect not. - Bowser - 8/18/2004 1:39:12 AM
        • Hollywood often makes movies that are absolute stinkers - Larry J - 8/18/2004 1:37:11 PM
          • What was wrong with Get Shorty? - alcaray - 8/18/2004 9:24:39 PM
            • It stank - Larry J - 8/19/2004 1:41:19 PM
              • Read the book (n/t) - alcaray - 8/19/2004 3:48:11 PM
          • re: Hollywood often makes movies that are absolute stinkers - Art Martin - 8/18/2004 6:31:12 PM
            • What about the movie insulted you? - Larry J - 8/18/2004 6:41:23 PM
              • re: What about the movie insulted you? - Art Martin - 8/19/2004 11:03:16 PM
                • Charismatic leaders - Larry J - 8/20/2004 1:00:25 AM
                  • re: Charismatic leaders - Art Martin - 8/20/2004 6:23:32 PM
  • Movie Title: Kerry's long war...Now that's funny - Scott Evil - 8/17/2004 4:47:25 PM
    • Oh... the Evil - SteveS - 8/18/2004 1:43:28 AM
    • 2 tours of duty Scott. Try to keep up. (n/t) - Tony - 8/17/2004 5:19:35 PM
      • re: You can't be serious... - Scott Evil - 8/17/2004 7:49:39 PM
        • OKaaaay - tony - 8/18/2004 1:56:09 AM
          • Not all 'tours of duty' are created equal - Larry J - 8/18/2004 3:42:08 PM
            • You just insulted pretty much a whole Navy-full of Viet Nam Vets (n/t) - alcaray - 8/18/2004 9:30:14 PM
              • Try studying some military history - Larry J - 8/19/2004 6:00:16 PM
                • Your personal attacks aside... - alcaray - 8/19/2004 6:36:03 PM
                  • It wasn't a personal attack, it was a statement of fact - Larry J - 8/19/2004 9:16:40 PM
                    • The problem here is either your reading comprehension... - alcaray - 8/19/2004 10:27:14 PM
                      • Instead of getting pissed at me... - Larry J - 8/20/2004 1:38:14 PM
                        • You are smoking like a whaler, now. This has nothing to do with your gaffe. (n/t) - alcaray - 8/20/2004 3:07:21 PM
            • OK - Tony - 8/18/2004 4:11:49 PM
              • "Next time any vet here says they served their country, I hope you dismiss it if they weren't actively being shot at." Like Bush? ;) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 8/18/2004 6:15:03 PM
                • Dunno. Does the current re-classification of service going on here count the National Guardsmen as Vets? :-) (n/t) - Tony - 8/18/2004 8:59:13 PM
                  • You set up the statement, not me. - Tom Brosz - 8/18/2004 11:14:41 PM
                    • Read this thread again. It's not me who is defining what counts as a "real" vet experience..... (n/t) - Tony - 8/19/2004 2:13:42 PM
                      • Wouldn't it be cool if Larry would say: "you are right, I misspoke" - alcaray - 8/19/2004 4:18:18 PM
                        • Why would I say something that obviously isn't true? - Larry J - 8/19/2004 6:00:48 PM
                          • If I were small-minded - alcaray - 8/19/2004 6:38:59 PM
                        • Not in my lifetime - Tony - 8/19/2004 4:36:15 PM
              • You misunderstand - Larry J - 8/18/2004 6:07:06 PM
                • Other than Harkin, who exactly is "Falsely claiming combat veteran status "? (n/t) - Tony - 8/18/2004 8:57:22 PM
                  • Exaggerating one's record is falsely claiming combat status - Larry J - 8/19/2004 1:59:31 PM
          • You forgot Christmas in Cambodia ;-) - SteveS - 8/18/2004 2:01:58 AM
      • re: 2 tours of duty - Tom Brosz - 8/17/2004 6:36:30 PM
        • And where was George? - Mary Anne - 8/18/2004 3:22:43 AM
          • That's kind-of the point - Scott Evil - 8/18/2004 1:34:18 PM
          • Knee-jerk response #3 - Tom Brosz - 8/18/2004 7:28:58 AM
  • "Then there's the media, which has dedicated itself to a Kerry victory." should be "Then there's the media, which have dedicated themselves to a Kerry victory." - David F Mayer - 8/17/2004 4:43:57 PM
    • should be "Then there are the media, which have dedicated themselves to a Kerry victory." (n/t) - DFM - 8/17/2004 4:45:01 PM