Current Events » in reply to re: Speaking of Rwanda v Iraq

The whole thread (38 posts)

• Ivory Coast Slaughter - p - 11/30/2004 3:36:44 PM
  • re: Yes and... - Raoul - 11/30/2004 5:20:15 PM
    • Speaking of Africa & The Weasels, lest we forget, Rwanda - p - 11/30/2004 9:20:01 PM
      • re: Speaking of Africa & The Weasels, lest we forget, Rwanda - lingo - 1/19/2005 9:30:08 PM
      • Yeah right, it was the fault of France and Belgium, the Hutu's and Tutsie's had nothing to do with it? (n/t) - Publius - 12/2/2004 8:12:53 PM
      • re: Speaking of Rwanda v Iraq - Raoul - 11/30/2004 10:16:36 PM
        • The BIG difference is there is no known oil in Rwanda .... (n/t) - Publius - 12/1/2004 3:36:26 PM
          • I would suggest that history shows the biggest differnece is that Belgium and the UN led the way in Rwanda. (n/t) - ebnelson - 12/2/2004 2:20:48 PM
        • Yeah That Makes It All Right - Mark Eby - 12/1/2004 1:22:50 AM
        • The difference between nice words and real deeds, and by the way, the war was provoked, and started by Iraq. Good luck next time - ebnelson - 11/30/2004 11:02:31 PM
      • re: Panties on heads is funny. - Scott Evil - 11/30/2004 9:53:27 PM
    • What does that have to do with French neo-imperialism and the acceptance of French slaughter of civilians? (n/t) - ebnelson - 11/30/2004 6:38:11 PM
    • hold on there, sparky - Davin L. - 11/30/2004 5:44:33 PM
      • This is a primary problem with the United Nations, too. - Tom Brosz - 11/30/2004 10:35:11 PM
        • The UN is not an alliance. Never was. Never was intended to be. - alcaray - 11/30/2004 10:57:16 PM
          • re: The UN is not an alliance - Tom Brosz - 12/1/2004 1:49:11 AM
            • So you think the UN equals a government? Or is your post moot? (n/t) - alcaray - 12/1/2004 5:33:11 PM
              • re: So you think the UN equals a government? - Tom Brosz - 12/1/2004 10:41:45 PM
                • You have spun this so increasingly far from any point tried to make about what you said! - alcaray - 12/2/2004 10:34:42 PM
                  • I'm talking about the U.N. as it actually is, and as it wants to become. - Tom Brosz - 12/3/2004 12:50:06 AM
                    • Now you can read the mind of an organization of member states! - alcaray - 12/3/2004 1:01:57 AM
                      • re: No. I read their reports. See thread above. - Tom Brosz - 12/3/2004 1:51:12 AM
            • Much Too Subtle For Europhiles & UNaholics (n/t) - Mark Eby - 12/1/2004 3:37:30 AM
              • Great thinking: I'll ad 'Europhiles' and 'UNaholics' next to BDS, Saddam Lover, Bush Hater, and - Davin L. - 12/1/2004 5:42:12 PM
                • re: Great thinking - Tom Brosz - 12/1/2004 11:41:00 PM
      • Courts without accountability are another form of tyranny - Larry J - 11/30/2004 6:23:09 PM
        • turn your Auto-Disagreement mode off, Larry - Davin L. - 11/30/2004 8:15:45 PM
          • And who is the UN accountable to? - Larry J - 11/30/2004 8:59:38 PM
            • Gee, Larry- Thats kind of the whole point! - Davin L. - 12/1/2004 12:39:15 AM
              • Circular argument - Larry J - 12/1/2004 3:09:57 PM
                • Dear lord, you are just a combative old fellow looking for a fight. - Davin L. - 12/1/2004 3:43:20 PM
                • re: Circular argument - gbaikie - 12/1/2004 3:32:03 PM
            • re: Purpose and competences - Raoul - 11/30/2004 10:03:38 PM
              • re: Purpose and competences - gbaikie - 12/1/2004 12:27:59 AM
        • re: the terrorists will hold the ICC accountable. - Scott Evil - 11/30/2004 6:41:37 PM
        • Think of it as a Supreme Court - who hold them accountable? (n/t) - Tony - 11/30/2004 6:24:26 PM
          • Primarily the Congress - Larry J - 11/30/2004 7:17:32 PM
  • You are VERY bad. Only thngs done by the USA or Israel count. France is above all that. No criticism allowed. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 11/30/2004 3:55:28 PM