I've never seen anthropomorphism extended quite so far before.
My first post said exactly all I wanted to say. It was in response to your occasional assertion that what is wrong with the UN is that we let the bad guys in. Every time I hear you bang this drum I am moved to challange it for the silliness that it is: the purpose of the UN is to bring all nations together to foster peace between all nations.
If you want a club with a selective membership then you form an alliance. That is what you call a group of countries with common interests exclusive of a group of countries that do not share those interests. The UN is supposed to include everyone. It is not an alliance.
Dude! It is so freaking simple.
Current Events » in reply to I'm talking about the U.N. as it actually is, and as it wants to become.
Now you can read the mind of an organization of member states!
The whole thread (38 posts)
- Ivory Coast Slaughter
- re: Yes and...
- Speaking of Africa & The Weasels, lest we forget, Rwanda
- re: Speaking of Africa & The Weasels, lest we forget, Rwanda
- Yeah right, it was the fault of France and Belgium, the Hutu's and Tutsie's had nothing to do with it? (n/t)
- re: Speaking of Rwanda v Iraq
- re: Panties on heads is funny.
- What does that have to do with French neo-imperialism and the acceptance of French slaughter of civilians? (n/t)
- hold on there, sparky
- This is a primary problem with the United Nations, too.
- Courts without accountability are another form of tyranny
- Speaking of Africa & The Weasels, lest we forget, Rwanda
- You are VERY bad. Only thngs done by the USA or Israel count. France is above all that. No criticism allowed. (n/t)
- re: Yes and...
