re: No. I read their reports. See thread above.
If the function of the U.N. is to get nations together over a cup of tea to discuss trade, humanitarian needs, and sort out other differences, then it's fine in its current form.
If it's going to have any power at all over the military activities of nations, or have legal power to try and convict citizens of sovereign nations, among other functions normally assigned to a govenment, then you need to be a lot fussier about who you let call the shots.
Is that "freaking simple" enough?