pure sophistry. Try harder, Robert
And he refers to a "movement" to which he belongs and which is clearly not the NeoNazis--by implication it's a successor. You should find out more about that movment and attack it if you think it's as bad or worse than the Neos
OK, so he's not a neo-Nazi. However he's clearly a Nazi sympathizer, as you should damn well remember, and as RL and Steve have just reminded us. So perhaps then, I should have referred to a "miserable Nazi sympathizing cretin". Robert, that is a spurious argument.
Also Robert, you make too much of a big deal of my supposed 'satisfaction' in 'dissing' this guy. Ahem: 'satisfaction' in my book, doesn't include trembling with rage. which is literally sometimes what I do after writing these types of posts.
Keep your pop-psychology personality evaluations to yourself.