It makes perfect sense to me.
Yet replies b) and e) are quite frequent. Reply f) is often the choice when b) and e) are in use.
If I (not a Jew) speak up for the Jewish children and their parents, I'm never sure if I'll get your response, a faceful of venom, the suggestion to segregate (genteel repression), or "oh, why can't you keep quiet?" as a reply. Yet all these respondents identify themselves as Christians. It tends to make one defensive and prepared for the worst. I didn't used to be that way, but I have been taught well.
I threw in the extra one, about the religious program, as an afterthought because I know proactive yet conservative Christians who would consider that alternative -- more work -- to be a decent compromise between their religious requirement to witness and their civic requirement to be tolerant of others' beliefs. That's more a Church of the Brethren type response.
Current Events » in reply to re: I take you at face value. Let me ask you a question:
That would seem to be the sensible thing to do.
The whole thread (46 posts)
- Its about time someone stood up
- All Republicans are not Christians.
- Wrong again
- Look at the actions, not the words.
- Don't know if your community church represents what's known as the Christian Right
- re: Don't know if your community church represents what's known as the Christian Right
- Though I am certain that the Christian Right would welcome right-minded Methodists...
- re: Don't know if your community church represents what's known as the Christian Right
- re: Wrong again
- I take you at face value. Let me ask you a question:
