The rest of the post did not attract your comment. Only the bait. You are not interested in the question. You are only interested in yourself. Thank you. :)
Your history here has included extended exchanges with people who were talking about someone else that you took to mean you, in which you spend a lot of time soliciting and needing reassurance from other members of the community. You have been urged to chill more than a couple of times.
I am not profiling you as an enraged, self-obsessed Jew. Just as self-obsessed, needy, and quick to anger. That's plenty.
You asked me not to talk about your background (which you yourself revealed publicly), and I have not done so since then, until now. You said you had asked me once before, but I had not recalled that and so apologized at the time, sincerely. I am so sorry that you asked me not to do something once and I forgot, since you are, of course, the only person I think about all day. I take it that not remembering every little detail about you is the "strange behaviour" to which you refer.
Do you mind telling me what possible benefit I could receive by asceding to your demands on Flame? You have already put yourself into the category of people whom I will help only on principle.
O! alas and alack! I have lost the respect of a self-centered jerk! O woe is me!!!!!!
Current Events » in reply to You don't read other people very well - do you?
Exceedingly well
The whole thread (73 posts)
- Making sense of the Muslim outrage over the cartoons.
- They do not understand "Freedom of the Press".
- The more I think about it.
- One Muslim's view:
- "Jesus in a gay bar, with a "Jesus is a fag" caption. I would imagine that fundamental Christians would be outraged."
- re: Da Vinci's Last Supper
- While it was in poor taste, Freedom of the Press permits it.
- I find this hilarious....
- No religion is truthful, and therefore should never trump freedom of expression
- I think they were offensive to Christians.
- Your ignorance of the story of Mohammed is astounding.
- re: Thanks for the information oh most Knowledgable One.
- In reply to the post by the smearer of Catholics, below:
- oh, so you're actually denying the massacre at Medina are you?
- there is some debate about Muhammed yes...but most sources agree he owned slaves, made war, ordered assasinations, and killed jews.
- quite correct
- You're welcome. It comes courtesy of a Hungarian refugee who served in the Hungarian foreign service in Turkey.
- In reply to the post by the smearer of Catholics, below:
- re: Thanks for the information oh most Knowledgable One.
- Your ignorance of the story of Mohammed is astounding.
- Thoughtul post, thanks