The belief that this is a "criminal" problem is also quite comforting to a lot of people. After all, arresting those few people who actually bombed the World Trade Center in 1993 made that building safe forever, right? Surely if we'd caught the hijackers on 9/11, no other attempt would ever have been made? And if we caught bin Laden now, the whole problem would fade away.
I recommend a little research on the extent of the problem of radical Islam, including those nations that support it, not all of which are considered "terrorist nations" by our government. Start with reading up on what the leadership of Iran actually believes.
It's astounding that liberals can be driven into near-epilepsy by an American president who mentions God just a little too often, but smile and nod like lobotomy patients when it's pointed out that the leadership of Iran, currently working feverishly on A-bombs, is enthusiasticially and publicly a believer in goals reached through an all-consuming apocalypse.
Flame » in reply to Still letting other people connect the dots for you?
"Criminal" attacks.
The whole thread (58 posts)
- Exit Strategy
- Saudi Arabian nuclear programme
- The biggest flaw in American armchair strategic analysis...
- Is all this going to be before or after Iran detonates their first nuke?
- re:Who is the monster, in the Iraqi's current viewpoint?
- "Withdrawal from Iraq will simply lead to a far worse conflict down the road."
- Just out of curiosity...
- restore services in a few months...
- re: Just out of curiosity...
- re: Just out of curiosity...
- Silly projections
- Justice does not permit punishment based on what someone might do.
- Read the Congressional resolution on Iraq
- But the big one is this one.
- The time period under discussion is post Gulf War
- But the big one is this one.
- Read the Congressional resolution on Iraq
- Justice does not permit punishment based on what someone might do.
- Silly projections
- Just out of curiosity...
- re: Iran = China in the 70's?
- I couldn't have said it better.
