Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to The accusation under discussion is a positive assertion that had not been confirmed by an international agency.

re: The accusation under discussion is a positive assertion that had not been confirmed by an international agency.

"At the time, I had hoped that the President had proof positive from classified sources. I believed that he wouldn't have lauched a war and endangered American lives (I have never believed he cares much about non-Americans) with less than ironclad proof."

Would personal assurance from Jordanian Intellience and it's leader count as "classified sources".
Or are we only considering data from star war type technology has ironclad proof?. Doesn't the fact the Iraqi commander thought Saddam had these weapons, mean anything?
Probably if Saddam had to to tell the truth, he thought he had these weapons:)
Give any example of anything which is "ironclad proof" of anything. Certainly that OJ simpson murdered his wife wouldn't fit this idea of ironclad proof.

Oh, but I forgot, I guess there is ironclad proof that humans are causing global warming.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (58 posts)