Yes, I read your reply to TB. You are simply restating your hypothesis in reshufled (equally incorrect) verbiage, while ignoring every single thing thats been said to you by me and Brosz and others.
You want there to be something 'special' about the commonplace, well understood natural phenomenon of radioactivity that somehow kicks the earths atmosphere out the door of the ionosphere- somehow more than natural processes that are billions, if not trillions of times more energetic. Again and again people patiently explain to you why its not going to happen, and again and again you ignore the information laid at your feet and simply persist in restating what you have already said... That there is some sort of 'pixie dust effect' in radioactivity that does what you say it does.
All the while- you don't have a single basic data point to lay on the tale about how the earths atmosphere is decreasing in density.
I don't know what is more idiotic- that we keep entertaining your trolling, or that you are so impervious to fact, reason, common sense, basic physics, logic, thought experiments, analogy, metaphor, dialogue, demonstration by example, proof from first principle, comparison, every-day experience... etc etc etc. I've met slabs of granite that were more intellectually flexible.
I suppose now you will wax on and on about how we're so closed minded. By all means, don't let me, or the facts, stand in the way of a good fantasy world
DL
Off Topic » in reply to re: Can you link all the observed global changes to the amount of "greenhouse gasses"?
re: Can you link all the observed global changes to the amount of "greenhouse gasses"?
The whole thread (74 posts)
- I was always a skeptic of Global Warming
- got snow?
- Why yes, we do.
- It is in the 80's in SoCal today. (n/t)
- No wonder, you're smack dab right in the middle of the Rocky Mountain foothills
- re: Bruce Peninsula also has a nuclear power station, but then
- A pleasant reply, in which I do not use the word MORON (aside from the title)
- re: A pleasant reply,
- If the atmospheric density has decreased there is a very easy way to measure it.
- You did not address my points why should we take you seriously?, (n/t)
- I'm skeptical...
- re: A pleasant reply,
- Nuclear reactors don't release radioactive material in normal operation.
- A pleasant reply, in which I do not use the word MORON (aside from the title)
- Actually, it's a bit unusual.
- re: Bruce Peninsula also has a nuclear power station, but then
- re:Same in the Alps! (n/t)
- got snow?
