I figured I might have screwed that up. Joules and watts have given me trouble before, and I suspected I flubbed a decimal in there somewhere.
The joule figures for solar influx are in the table, and the overall capacity of the world's atomic power plants are around 300,000 MW.
The main point was that the energy balance of the Earth is a process, a flow, not a bucket into which things are dumped to just lie there, and that in a flow of that magnitude, it takes a hell of a lot to make even a small difference in the mean condition.
The Earth eventually radiates, by definition, almost exactly as much heat into space as it gets from the sun. If it didn't, at some point it would end up a molten ball. The beauty of our ecology is that it seems, over millions of years, to have been able to accommodate minor variations from many sources, including the sun, while remaining in the zone in which life is possible. Not always comfortable, but possible.
Off Topic » in reply to EXCELLENT post- but....
Thanks
The whole thread (74 posts)
- I was always a skeptic of Global Warming
- got snow?
- Why yes, we do.
- It is in the 80's in SoCal today. (n/t)
- No wonder, you're smack dab right in the middle of the Rocky Mountain foothills
- re: Bruce Peninsula also has a nuclear power station, but then
- A pleasant reply, in which I do not use the word MORON (aside from the title)
- re: A pleasant reply,
- If the atmospheric density has decreased there is a very easy way to measure it.
- You did not address my points why should we take you seriously?, (n/t)
- I'm skeptical...
- re: A pleasant reply,
- Nuclear reactors don't release radioactive material in normal operation.
- A pleasant reply, in which I do not use the word MORON (aside from the title)
- Actually, it's a bit unusual.
- re: Bruce Peninsula also has a nuclear power station, but then
- re:Same in the Alps! (n/t)
- got snow?
