Right, so you/re 4-standard deviations from the mean snowfall

Off Topic » in reply to Actually, it's a bit unusual.

Right, so you/re 4-standard deviations from the mean snowfall

SDF — 1/8/2007 1:50:23 PM (archived)

So, it'll happen a few times in a century, as seems to be confirmed by historical records.

The whole thread (74 posts)

I was always a skeptic of Global Warming - SDF - 1/6/2007 1:59:05 PM
- got snow? - podrock - 1/6/2007 4:05:04 PM
  - Why yes, we do. - Laurie Street - 1/11/2007 7:31:46 PM
    - round 4 - podrock - 1/11/2007 7:40:34 PM
      - WInter comes to Dallas - Fox - 1/12/2007 7:05:17 PM
        
        Update: ice storm warning - Fox - 1/13/2007 2:23:17 AM
        
        re: Update: ice storm warning - Lindy - 1/13/2007 2:58:46 PM
        
        So far, not too bad - Fox - 1/13/2007 7:06:27 PM
  - It is in the 80's in SoCal today. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/8/2007 7:34:26 PM
  - No wonder, you're smack dab right in the middle of the Rocky Mountain foothills - SDF - 1/7/2007 2:50:41 PM
    - re: Bruce Peninsula also has a nuclear power station, but then - Johannes - 1/8/2007 5:40:51 AM
      - A pleasant reply, in which I do not use the word MORON (aside from the title) - R.L. - 1/9/2007 9:46:01 AM
        
        re: A pleasant reply, - Johannes - 1/10/2007 4:29:54 AM
        
        If the atmospheric density has decreased there is a very easy way to measure it. - Tony - 1/11/2007 6:25:34 PM
        
        re: Long time ago - Johannes - 1/12/2007 9:10:18 PM
        
        re: Long time ago - alcaray - 1/12/2007 9:33:00 PM
        
        re: You said: - Johannes - 1/13/2007 3:12:29 AM
        
        Too silly. Not fun any more. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/13/2007 7:27:36 AM
        
        You did not address my points why should we take you seriously?, (n/t) - R.L. - 1/11/2007 2:30:01 AM
        
        re: Can you link all the observed global changes to the amount of "greenhouse gasses"? - Johannes - 1/11/2007 6:49:05 AM
        
        We've been over the earthquake thing before. - podrock - 1/11/2007 11:34:11 PM
        
        re:That is why said that there seems to be, rather than there is. (n/t) - Johannes - 1/12/2007 5:55:41 AM
        
        Maybe the data you need is here: - podrock - 1/12/2007 11:11:27 PM
        
        re: Thank you for the link - Johannes - 1/13/2007 5:18:43 AM
        
        then there *seems* to be no reason to buy what you are selling. (n/t) - Yeti - 1/12/2007 6:22:22 AM
        
        re: Can you link all the observed global changes to the amount of "greenhouse gasses"? - Time Wasting Yeti - 1/11/2007 9:10:47 PM
        
        re: Can you link all the observed global changes to the amount of "greenhouse gasses"? - Johannes - 1/12/2007 6:08:18 AM
        
        re: Can you link all the observed global changes to the amount of "greenhouse gasses"? - Yeti - 1/12/2007 6:32:39 AM
        
        re: FACT - Johannes - 1/12/2007 9:33:10 PM
        
        Ohhh.... My..... God..... - Yeti - 1/13/2007 1:09:01 AM
        
        Aiii Chonito!!! (n/t) - alcaray - 1/12/2007 9:44:39 PM
        
        PS: Look up the phenomenon: 'Ionospheric outflow' (n/t) - Yeti - 1/11/2007 9:25:41 PM
        
        I'm skeptical... - alcaray - 1/10/2007 4:58:11 PM
        
        re: Actually it was more like 40 years ago - Johannes - 1/11/2007 12:45:22 AM
        
        40 years is just as unbelievable. - alcaray - 1/11/2007 5:11:11 PM
        
        Here are some temperature statistics I found... - alcaray - 1/11/2007 7:10:51 PM
        
        Did I say 50%? Yipe! Make that 100%. (n/t) - alcaray the math whiz - 1/10/2007 7:12:35 PM
        
        re: Did I say 50%? Yipe! Make that 100%. - Yeti - 1/11/2007 9:42:43 PM
        
        I used the word "over" in the original sentence. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/11/2007 11:41:38 PM
        
        Errr, I used the phrase "more than", that is. First the math goes, then the memory. (n/t) - alcaray - 1/11/2007 11:43:22 PM
        
        re: Not to worry - Johannes - 1/12/2007 10:39:32 PM
      - Nuclear reactors don't release radioactive material in normal operation. - TB - 1/8/2007 8:12:39 AM
        
        re: There are some 6 billion people on the planet, if we all - Johannes - 1/9/2007 2:17:43 AM
        
        It is not correct. - TB - 1/9/2007 5:23:18 AM
        
        EXCELLENT post- but.... - R.L. - 1/9/2007 9:13:13 PM
        
        Thanks - TB - 1/9/2007 9:27:56 PM
        
        re: Thanks for the link TB - Johannes - 1/10/2007 5:22:00 AM
        
        No problem. - TB - 1/10/2007 5:55:35 AM
        
        re: I agree, but then - Johannes - 1/10/2007 8:22:06 PM
        
        Try this thought experiment... - TB - 1/11/2007 3:53:16 AM
        
        re: OK lets try the thought experiment - Johannes - 1/12/2007 5:44:43 AM
        
        re: thought experiment - TB - 1/12/2007 6:53:36 AM
        
        re: thought experiment - Johannes - 1/12/2007 10:29:39 PM
        
        Radioactive nitrogen - TB - 1/13/2007 3:26:34 AM
        
        re: thought experiment - CJ Burke - 1/13/2007 1:47:51 AM
        
        Oh my "God"! would you "stop" with the "scare" quotes? You "sound" like Dr. "Evil" - Yeti - 1/13/2007 1:24:56 AM
        
        Thank you. - Mary Anne - 1/8/2007 2:17:48 PM
        
        re: Thank you. - TB - 1/8/2007 5:37:28 PM
        
        Is that a cue for a Uranium Price Update? - podrock - 1/8/2007 8:24:13 PM
    - Actually, it's a bit unusual. - podrock - 1/7/2007 6:32:51 PM
      - Right, so you/re 4-standard deviations from the mean snowfall - SDF - 1/8/2007 1:50:23 PM
        
        I have to admit it seems chaotic - SDF - 1/8/2007 2:10:16 PM
        
        I had to go and mention Chinook winds! - podrock - 1/8/2007 4:50:07 PM
- re:Same in the Alps! (n/t) - Raoul - 1/6/2007 2:42:41 PM
  - re: re:Same on Mars! - SteveS - 1/7/2007 4:59:57 PM
    - re: Mars is a good example - Johannes - 1/8/2007 8:00:15 PM
  - re: re:Same in the Alps! - Fox - 1/7/2007 3:48:30 PM
    - Yes, it arrived! (n/t) - Raoul - 1/7/2007 5:10:04 PM
  - Screw the skiers...... - carl - 1/6/2007 3:04:39 PM
    - re: Of course not! - Raoul - 1/6/2007 5:13:08 PM
    - Polar Bears are dying off - Lindy - 1/6/2007 3:54:07 PM
      - No, they're not. - TB - 1/6/2007 10:51:27 PM
        
        Nothing to see here folks, move along - Lindy - 1/7/2007 3:33:57 AM
        
        Sorry to screw things up again by bringing facts and documentation into it. (n/t) - TB - 1/7/2007 3:51:33 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (74 posts)