Do you deny that Sadam is a threat to his neighbors?
Would you argue that the US should have negotiated with Hitler in the same way that you argue that the US should negotiate with Sadam?
Maybe Kuwait shouldn’t be thought of as Sadam’s Poland, that miught be a stretch, but lets compare the two in other ways:
1) Hitler decided against using WMD and Sadam has already shown that he will use WMD.
2) Sadam supports, funds, arms, and trains terrorists who target unsuspecting civilians
3) Sadam uses his own civilian population as to shield military assets.
I could go on but to summarize: Sadam is even more dangerous than Hitler.
One last thing to think about:
Given the chance, and given a pacifist world that would be willing to look the other way, do you seriously doubt that Sadam is capable of gassing 6 million Jews?
So you tell me how you think Sadam not equivalent to Hitler.
Current Events » in reply to you have an interesting version of historical revisionism
Are you denying that Sadam is a Totalitarian Leader?
The whole thread (57 posts)
- A monster died 50 years ago today...
- Another good article...
- More...
- And yet...
- Re: And yet...
- Re: And yet...
- Terminology
- Re: Terminology
- I can't be
- You raise an interesting point...Concerning our peception of Nazism. (Rant on Historical Revisionism)
- Terminology
- I never said that all dictators are Marxists...
- Re: And yet...
- Re: And yet...
- Whatever you do, don't call him "evil" that's too judgemental n/t (n/t)
- And yet...
- Re: A monster died 50 years ago today...
