Space/Science » in reply to Astronomers rule out asteroid risk in 2029

And Still Very Close (Another Image Try)

Mark Eby — 12/29/2004 1:58:17 AM (archived)

from Possibility of an Earth Impact in 2029 Ruled Out for Asteroid 2004 MN4 at JPL

Happy Holidays,
Mark

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (40 posts)

• 2004 MN4 now Torino scale 4 !!!! - Nick Hoffman - 12/25/2004 11:45:31 AM
  • Rats, Just Fell Off The Torino Scale - Mark Eby - 12/28/2004 2:25:07 AM
    • Back On Yet Again - Mark Eby - 12/31/2004 4:57:32 PM
    • Astronomers rule out asteroid risk in 2029 - SteveS - 12/28/2004 2:17:00 PM
      • And Still Very Close (Another Image Try) - Mark Eby - 12/29/2004 1:58:17 AM
      • But Not Later - Mark Eby - 12/29/2004 12:13:06 AM
        • Close Approaches - SteveS - 12/29/2004 1:36:25 AM
      • Well, that was exciting. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/28/2004 7:05:39 PM
  • 2.7% today... - Nick Hoffman - 12/27/2004 11:54:48 AM
    • An interesting geological issue... - Nick Hoffman - 12/27/2004 11:59:29 AM
  • Key NEO Report Links - Mark Eby - 12/26/2004 5:05:12 AM
  • Friday 13th... - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 1:43:16 AM
  • You know it's the one we don't see that's going to get us. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 7:36:08 PM
    • Only If We Act Responsibly - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 7:54:21 PM
  • re: 2004 MN4 - Nick Hoffman - 12/25/2004 12:36:54 PM
    • re: 2004 MN4 - Larry J - 12/25/2004 1:26:53 PM
      • Don't forget that damage and megatons don't scale directly - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 7:38:03 PM
        • re:Scaling - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 12:30:45 AM
          • Be interesting to compare the effects to a major volcanic eruption - Tom Brosz - 12/26/2004 1:44:00 AM
            • Yellowstone on the Torino Scale - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 3:21:46 AM
              • So We Are Talking About A Major Global Chill Event? - Mark Eby - 12/26/2004 3:30:45 AM
                • Chill but not Freeze... ...Probably - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 3:50:17 AM
                  • Some "apples and oranges." - Tom Brosz - 12/27/2004 8:30:40 PM
            • How Much of That Area Was IHL Deadly? - Mark Eby - 12/26/2004 3:21:24 AM
              • re: How Much of That Area Was IHL Deadly? - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 3:36:48 AM
                • Don't count the Mormons out just yet... - Tom Brosz - 12/27/2004 8:27:38 PM
        • More accurate numbers... - Larry J - 12/25/2004 8:39:01 PM
          • re: More accurate numbers... - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 10:41:11 PM
            • re: More accurate numbers... - Larry J - 12/26/2004 6:01:48 PM
        • Of course - Larry J - 12/25/2004 8:30:39 PM
      • 2004 MN4 - Just about the bestest Christmas present a boy ever had - E.P. Grondine - 12/25/2004 4:07:45 PM
        • What are the risks of impacts? - Robert Clark - 1/1/2005 3:18:06 PM
        • re: On Something We Can Partially Agree - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 7:52:23 PM
          • Oh f***... - Adam - 12/26/2004 2:05:44 AM
          • Thank you - E.P. Grondine - 12/25/2004 8:32:33 PM
        • If You Ever Bothered To Study Actual Detection Data - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 7:19:51 PM
          • uhhh, Mark, your condescension reveals your ignorance - E.P. Grondine - 12/25/2004 8:31:06 PM
            • Project Argos... - Adam - 12/26/2004 2:10:33 AM
              • It's definetely going to be a man-machine collaboration - E.P. Grondine - 12/26/2004 3:17:20 AM
            • Your Most Recent Comments & The Actual Data Make The Situation Clear - Nuff Said (n/t) - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 10:22:35 PM