I agree. I work on a scaling that the cube of the energy is approximately the diameter of the crater. Usefully, the crater diameter scales with the projectile diameter (for similar density and velocity). This is a 400m impactor so with the usual rule-of-thumb that's a 20x400m crater i.e. around 8 km
One thing to ponder is the impact on the ecosystem. Would an impactor 1/10 the energy of the end-cretaceous event do 1/10 the damage? or more? or Less? - I don't think anybody knows, and I don't really want to find out.
To put this in perspective, 2004 MN4 is FIVE orders of magnitude smaller than the end-K event, and would make a crater a mere twice the size of Barringer crater. Still a mess if it lands in your backyard, but unlikely to do more to the world than a nasty Tsunami or a few year's poor weather. Proper planning would carry us through the trauma, though population dislocations could be an issue.
Space/Science » in reply to Don't forget that damage and megatons don't scale directly
re:Scaling
The whole thread (40 posts)
- 2004 MN4 now Torino scale 4 !!!!
- Rats, Just Fell Off The Torino Scale
- 2.7% today...
- Key NEO Report Links
- Friday 13th...
- You know it's the one we don't see that's going to get us. (n/t)
- re: 2004 MN4
- re: 2004 MN4
- Don't forget that damage and megatons don't scale directly
- 2004 MN4 - Just about the bestest Christmas present a boy ever had
- re: 2004 MN4
