Oh f***...

Space/Science » in reply to re: On Something We Can Partially Agree

Oh f***...

Adam — 12/26/2004 2:05:44 AM (archived)

Mark & All

I just had a horrible thought... if it does look like an intercept the apocalyptic idiots will equate it with the fallen star from Revelation. Notice the intersect date... 2029. In some chronologies JC returns in c. 2033, 2000 years after he Ascended, and 2029 is 42 months prior, as per the Kingdom of the Beast.

Nice coincidence that won't be lost on the paranoids.

Adam

The whole thread (40 posts)

2004 MN4 now Torino scale 4 !!!! - Nick Hoffman - 12/25/2004 11:45:31 AM
- Rats, Just Fell Off The Torino Scale - Mark Eby - 12/28/2004 2:25:07 AM
  - Back On Yet Again - Mark Eby - 12/31/2004 4:57:32 PM
  - Astronomers rule out asteroid risk in 2029 - SteveS - 12/28/2004 2:17:00 PM
    - And Still Very Close (Another Image Try) - Mark Eby - 12/29/2004 1:58:17 AM
    - But Not Later - Mark Eby - 12/29/2004 12:13:06 AM
      - Close Approaches - SteveS - 12/29/2004 1:36:25 AM
    - Well, that was exciting. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/28/2004 7:05:39 PM
- 2.7% today... - Nick Hoffman - 12/27/2004 11:54:48 AM
  - An interesting geological issue... - Nick Hoffman - 12/27/2004 11:59:29 AM
- Key NEO Report Links - Mark Eby - 12/26/2004 5:05:12 AM
- Friday 13th... - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 1:43:16 AM
- You know it's the one we don't see that's going to get us. (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 7:36:08 PM
  - Only If We Act Responsibly - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 7:54:21 PM
- re: 2004 MN4 - Nick Hoffman - 12/25/2004 12:36:54 PM
  - re: 2004 MN4 - Larry J - 12/25/2004 1:26:53 PM
    - Don't forget that damage and megatons don't scale directly - Tom Brosz - 12/25/2004 7:38:03 PM
      - re:Scaling - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 12:30:45 AM
        
        Be interesting to compare the effects to a major volcanic eruption - Tom Brosz - 12/26/2004 1:44:00 AM
        
        Yellowstone on the Torino Scale - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 3:21:46 AM
        
        So We Are Talking About A Major Global Chill Event? - Mark Eby - 12/26/2004 3:30:45 AM
        
        Chill but not Freeze... ...Probably - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 3:50:17 AM
        
        Some "apples and oranges." - Tom Brosz - 12/27/2004 8:30:40 PM
        
        How Much of That Area Was IHL Deadly? - Mark Eby - 12/26/2004 3:21:24 AM
        
        re: How Much of That Area Was IHL Deadly? - Nick Hoffman - 12/26/2004 3:36:48 AM
        
        Don't count the Mormons out just yet... - Tom Brosz - 12/27/2004 8:27:38 PM
      - More accurate numbers... - Larry J - 12/25/2004 8:39:01 PM
        
        re: More accurate numbers... - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 10:41:11 PM
        
        re: More accurate numbers... - Larry J - 12/26/2004 6:01:48 PM
      - Of course - Larry J - 12/25/2004 8:30:39 PM
    - 2004 MN4 - Just about the bestest Christmas present a boy ever had - E.P. Grondine - 12/25/2004 4:07:45 PM
      - What are the risks of impacts? - Robert Clark - 1/1/2005 3:18:06 PM
      - re: On Something We Can Partially Agree - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 7:52:23 PM
        
        Oh f***... - Adam - 12/26/2004 2:05:44 AM
        
        Thank you - E.P. Grondine - 12/25/2004 8:32:33 PM
      - If You Ever Bothered To Study Actual Detection Data - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 7:19:51 PM
        
        uhhh, Mark, your condescension reveals your ignorance - E.P. Grondine - 12/25/2004 8:31:06 PM
        
        Project Argos... - Adam - 12/26/2004 2:10:33 AM
        
        It's definetely going to be a man-machine collaboration - E.P. Grondine - 12/26/2004 3:17:20 AM
        
        Your Most Recent Comments & The Actual Data Make The Situation Clear - Nuff Said (n/t) - Mark Eby - 12/25/2004 10:22:35 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (40 posts)