"The report, which apparently runs over 400 pages, has not been released to the general public, and those in the press who have seen it sure aren't going to spread it around."
So, you have not seen it either and you don't know if there is exculpatory or damning information in it.
But you are sitting here claiming that the press is conspiring to keep it quiet because it will no-doubt clear 'your guy'.
Now, how is this different from Lindy-esque arguments concerning what conspiring minds don't want you to know?
Do you even have any evidence that the press has seen this? Or is this all just more subjective BS and....
Yetis.
Thats right, it appears we are back to Yetiological arguments from the right.
DL
Current Events » in reply to re: Hurricane "Pam"
re: Hurricane "Yeti"
The whole thread (51 posts)
- This will be interesting
- Nailing Brown on Hurricane "Pam"
- Well lets just see if those weasels on the committee are able to pin anything on the guy.
- Just for the exercise:
- And BTW
- So you think people just 'materialized', like spontaneous generation? Or just 'stopped in' on the way to the superdome and decided they loved the view?
- Forget the news reports
- Yes, I am sure he was fired for personal hygene.
- You must only be listening to the Democrat's questioning...
- What scorecard?
- more inventions from the Right: "but if enough of the right wing ape it and repeat it enough"
- The committee is looking for validation?
- What scorecard?
