Now that I think about it, it's hard to see where we have anything to disagree about.
1) A fundamental and passionately-fought plank of Conservatism is the destruction of all government social spending.
2) We who take exception to that are told (after "STFU") that we shouldn't worry, because private charities will take up the slack, and there will always be a safety net for those in need.
3) According to all Conservative rhetoric on the subject, those in need possess a character flaw which renders them undeserving of aid.
4) Obviously, therefore, the safety net won't be created through the contributions of Conservatives.
5) Obviously, this is the "Compassionate Conservatives" way of saying "if y'all wanna go and have a damn social conscience, y'all can damn well pay for it yerselves."
I know you'd agree with #5, so why exactly are we arguing?.
Current Events » in reply to You really have no clue what you're talking about.
The Tooth Fairy, The Easter Bunny, and Compassionate Conservatives
The whole thread (57 posts)
- Buffet's $$$$ and Gates Foundations MOTIVES?
- I don't get it...
- Who cares about motives? It's their money.
- Should anyone be taxed, ever, then?
- re: Should anyone be taxed, ever, then?
- the estate tax
- Ahhhhh, do the RICH pay TAXES????
- Should anyone be taxed, ever, then?
- I only wish...
- Try Paul Allen..... (n/t)
- Basic facts
- Try some research first
- People start getting nice when the Abyss approaches
