If I see spaceprojects.com, or nasawatch.info anywhere on the toc on the board, the message will be deleted.
This was a strong suggestion I made to him earlier regarding how to improve his posting habits, but one he chose not to follow. It has continued to cause problems so I will requlire it.
I will not say he can't link to things within his posts, e.g. if he linked to one of his sites in his signature block. I certainly would not object to Keith Cowing signing his posts with "nasawatch.com" so I will not hold a double standard.
Also, if he starts a high volume of (n/t) posts I will start deleting him as well. If I start seeing a pattern of posts from him that are not (n/t) but just have a link to his website in the message body they will be deleted. Or if he meet previous conditions with only minimal useless text in the message body etc. . . The simple way for him to not cause trouble will be to post like everyone else.
-Justin Kelly
Flame » in reply to Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
Ok, heres what I will do
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- Boy, this sure turned out to be a mature discussion of the issue, didn't it? (n/t)
- Ok, heres what I will do
- An observation and my vote
- the real issue is this
- Why be so self-important, truth-denying, competitive prizes-HATING and downright misleading?
- He should addopt a URL free handle or can his ass. (n/t)
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- Ok then.
- You fail to see what the health care vs. space expenditures debate has to do with space? WOW.
- Ok then.
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- re: Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- My feelings on Woodlock, and the spammer....
- R.L. is on the right track
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Ditto (n/t)
- So you receive tax dollars, but your resentfulness of me has NOTHING to do with my pro-entrepreneurial stance...
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- The use of a 100% NONcommercial handle minimizes the potential for (often misinformed) ad hominem attacks.
- R.L. is on the right track
- Ban him -- He's spam and nothing more (n/t)
- No
- No
- Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more.
- re: You held a similar discussion about me a while back