I don't read him, so he hasn't offended me.
I pick and choose what I read, and who, on all the boards, so I don't think of what he (and similar others) do as "spam". So it takes a couple extra minutes to scan the TOCs for something interesting... big deal. I read fast anyway.
Every time someone's questionable behavior is brought up for "official" public discussion, the consensus is anti-censorship. I see no need to re-hash the same arguments.
But here's a open question to chew on: How is posting anomalism for all to deride and mock different from posting it because you believe in it? Yes, I saw that you moved that thread to Flame, where it probably belonged originally... but a strict interpretation of this board's "credo" on the splash page might say it doesn't belong anywhere.
Flame » in reply to re: You held a similar discussion about me a while back
Abstain
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- Boy, this sure turned out to be a mature discussion of the issue, didn't it? (n/t)
- Ok, heres what I will do
- An observation and my vote
- the real issue is this
- Why be so self-important, truth-denying, competitive prizes-HATING and downright misleading?
- He should addopt a URL free handle or can his ass. (n/t)
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- Ok then.
- You fail to see what the health care vs. space expenditures debate has to do with space? WOW.
- Ok then.
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- re: Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- My feelings on Woodlock, and the spammer....
- R.L. is on the right track
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Ditto (n/t)
- So you receive tax dollars, but your resentfulness of me has NOTHING to do with my pro-entrepreneurial stance...
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- The use of a 100% NONcommercial handle minimizes the potential for (often misinformed) ad hominem attacks.
- R.L. is on the right track
- Ban him -- He's spam and nothing more (n/t)
- No
- No
- Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more.
- re: You held a similar discussion about me a while back
