And presumably your THREE (n/t) postings in this lone thread somehow are NOT spam?

Flame » in reply to Ban him -- He's spam and nothing more

And presumably your THREE (n/t) postings in this lone thread somehow are NOT spam?

SpaceProjects.com — 1/11/2004 10:16:13 PM (archived)

It would seem that you have an ulterior motive behind wanting my pro-entrepreneurial message censored. The spam accusation just doesn't seem to fit. If we assume for a moment that it does then perhaps you might want to look back at whom your other three fingers are pointing? I mean what is spam if not your THREE (n/t) postings in this lone thread?

The whole thread (61 posts)

Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting - Justin Kelly - 1/11/2004 2:25:44 PM
- Boy, this sure turned out to be a mature discussion of the issue, didn't it? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2004 4:44:34 AM
- Ok, heres what I will do - Justin Kelly - 1/15/2004 1:52:04 AM
  - Couldn't this wasted energy have been spent modernizing your html? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 3:27:23 AM
    - toc = Table Of Contents (list where threaded messages apear) - Justin Kelly - 1/17/2004 6:18:30 AM
      - re: Mornin', J . . . - D. Spires - 1/17/2004 11:21:37 AM
        
        re: 'mornin, Dan ;-) - Justin Kelly - 1/17/2004 6:04:40 PM
        
        Oh, boy, a real CAVE? - Nick Hoffman - 1/21/2004 1:19:59 AM
        
        "searchable message history..." - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2004 10:34:03 PM
    - re: Couldn't this wasted energy have been spent modernizing your html? - SDG - 1/16/2004 12:26:44 AM
- An observation and my vote - alcaray - 1/14/2004 11:55:43 PM
- the real issue is this - R.L. - 1/14/2004 7:33:34 AM
  - Why be so self-important, truth-denying, competitive prizes-HATING and downright misleading? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/14/2004 6:12:54 PM
    - You would be humorous if you werent such an inane loser.... - R.L. - 1/15/2004 3:54:25 AM
      - Here's a very serious question for you, "R.L."... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 4:41:39 AM
        
        Please note : Rich did not address a single point I raised - R.L. - 1/15/2004 5:12:15 AM
        
        You've never addressed my points with intellectual integrity, so why should I bother with your umpteenth question? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 6:00:09 AM
        
        Why are you so obsessed with my picture? - R.L. - 1/15/2004 7:34:28 PM
        
        You are to be taken seriously? - R.L. - 1/15/2004 8:33:35 AM
        
        Actually, I did- You can't read... - R.L. - 1/15/2004 6:27:45 AM
        
        NASA vs. NSF: Bush apparently touted an NSF achievement when praising NASA yesterday! - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 7:22:38 PM
        
        OINK OINK!!! - Spaceprojects.crap - 1/15/2004 10:49:11 PM
        
        Now you are just lying - R.L. - 1/15/2004 10:33:48 PM
- He should addopt a URL free handle or can his ass. (n/t) - et - 1/12/2004 6:26:38 PM
  - Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 8:16:34 PM
    - Ok then. - et - 1/13/2004 6:25:40 PM
      - You fail to see what the health care vs. space expenditures debate has to do with space? WOW. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 7:01:21 PM
        
        Well, he would fit right in Current Events. Jusk keep him out of space please. (n/t) - et - 1/13/2004 7:06:53 PM
        
        Space forum: "This board will include, with loose interpretation: Space Science & Technology, past, present and future; Fiction, History and Politics with regard to space as well as general aviation." - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 7:15:24 PM
        
        Which category does Hillary-bashing fall under? - et - 1/13/2004 9:25:55 PM
        
        Which posting of mine falls under your Hillary-bashing category? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 10:17:39 PM
- re: Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting - Johannes - 1/12/2004 5:20:17 AM
- My feelings on Woodlock, and the spammer.... - R.L. - 1/11/2004 11:12:44 PM
  - R.L. is on the right track - Gary - 1/12/2004 12:59:59 AM
    - Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 1:12:36 AM
      - This has nothing to do with our jobs - R.L. - 1/12/2004 1:52:21 AM
        
        Ditto (n/t) - Gary - 1/12/2004 4:12:57 AM
        
        Â¿Et tu, Gary? :-) I STILL wish Beagle 2 had succeeded and outshined NASA, though... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 4:51:15 AM
        
        So you receive tax dollars, but your resentfulness of me has NOTHING to do with my pro-entrepreneurial stance... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 2:54:29 AM
        
        You bumbling moron- you made a fool of yourself, you spamming annoyance... - R.L. - 1/13/2004 5:01:07 AM
        
        Why do you think I'm against govt. funding (which you admit to desperately needing, by the way)? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 6:17:15 AM
        
        Either you did not read what I said, or you are too stupid to understand it... - R.L. - 1/13/2004 6:42:03 AM
        
        Your repeatedly groundless insults suggest you have good reason to fear a meritocracy's emergence in govt. procurement. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 3:27:39 PM
        
        You cant read - R.L. - 1/13/2004 8:14:21 PM
        
        You can't write... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 10:11:29 PM
        
        one last time for the insane spammer - R.L. - 1/14/2004 5:07:41 AM
        
        You lack intellectual integrity, are manic, and deserve the Darwin award. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/14/2004 6:03:23 PM
  - The use of a 100% NONcommercial handle minimizes the potential for (often misinformed) ad hominem attacks. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/11/2004 11:45:48 PM
- Ban him -- He's spam and nothing more (n/t) - Gary - 1/11/2004 6:13:58 PM
  - And presumably your THREE (n/t) postings in this lone thread somehow are NOT spam? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/11/2004 10:16:13 PM
    - re: As amazing as it may seem to you -- no, they are not . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 1/17/2004 10:59:35 AM
- No - Mark Eby - 1/11/2004 4:52:22 PM
- No - Buck Galaxy - 1/11/2004 4:41:13 PM
- Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more. - SOCRATES(?) / SpaceProjects.com - 1/11/2004 2:49:58 PM
  - re: Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more. - fuck you - 2/13/2004 3:44:11 AM
  - I rest my case (n/t) - Gary - 1/11/2004 6:17:09 PM
- re: You held a similar discussion about me a while back - Success_Machine - 1/11/2004 2:43:15 PM
  - You didn't spam the HZ (n/t) - Gary - 1/11/2004 6:19:08 PM
    - re: I use HZ to present my ideas. - Success_Machine - 1/12/2004 2:07:49 PM
  - Abstain - Fox - 1/11/2004 3:59:13 PM
    - RE: open question - SDG - 1/12/2004 8:29:12 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (61 posts)