Which posting of mine falls under your Hillary-bashing category? But I know, I know. You don't REALLY think I was Hillary bashing simply because I mentioned that she's now championing a cause (healthcare) that Joe Lieberman recently said deserves funding that Bush would rather allocate to Mars. And you don't REALLY fail to see how the "healthcare vs. space funding" debate is relevant to the space forum. You were simply trying to call out for help from fellow statists by making it seem like a crown jewel statist is under fire. Her philosophy is though, just not in the ad hominem way that you and your ilk think it's perfectly fine to use as long as the target's a fiscal conservative. I mean, to paraphrase Ann Coulter, at least when fiscal conservatives rant, there's a POINT. Why don't you come clean and disclose whether or not you receive tax dollars? Your objections to me certainly don't appear to be driven by reason (as opposed to visceral fear of pro entrepreneurial reforms that could leave mere parasites sidelined).
Flame » in reply to Which category does Hillary-bashing fall under?
Which posting of mine falls under your Hillary-bashing category?
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- Boy, this sure turned out to be a mature discussion of the issue, didn't it? (n/t)
- Ok, heres what I will do
- An observation and my vote
- the real issue is this
- Why be so self-important, truth-denying, competitive prizes-HATING and downright misleading?
- He should addopt a URL free handle or can his ass. (n/t)
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- Ok then.
- You fail to see what the health care vs. space expenditures debate has to do with space? WOW.
- Ok then.
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- re: Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- My feelings on Woodlock, and the spammer....
- R.L. is on the right track
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Ditto (n/t)
- So you receive tax dollars, but your resentfulness of me has NOTHING to do with my pro-entrepreneurial stance...
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- The use of a 100% NONcommercial handle minimizes the potential for (often misinformed) ad hominem attacks.
- R.L. is on the right track
- Ban him -- He's spam and nothing more (n/t)
- No
- No
- Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more.
- re: You held a similar discussion about me a while back
