Please note : Rich did not address a single point I raised

Flame » in reply to Here's a very serious question for you, "R.L."...

Please note : Rich did not address a single point I raised

R.L. — 1/15/2004 5:12:15 AM (archived)

LOL you cretin,
If you actually participated here you would know my face is here for all to see.... I am curious, why do you find a picture of a person relavent to the debate? I guess you ran out of legitimate arguments...

AGAIN, I get no tax dollars, the fact that you keep claiming I do just publicizes your ignorance...

You lost this nonsense argument, you are an uneducated wannabe.... you have been given the rules for your continued posting- follow them... otherwise PISS OFF!

You have humiliated yourself publicly, the fact you dont see that speaks to your sick mental state.... You are pitiful

The whole thread (61 posts)

Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting - Justin Kelly - 1/11/2004 2:25:44 PM
- Boy, this sure turned out to be a mature discussion of the issue, didn't it? (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2004 4:44:34 AM
- Ok, heres what I will do - Justin Kelly - 1/15/2004 1:52:04 AM
  - Couldn't this wasted energy have been spent modernizing your html? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 3:27:23 AM
    - toc = Table Of Contents (list where threaded messages apear) - Justin Kelly - 1/17/2004 6:18:30 AM
      - re: Mornin', J . . . - D. Spires - 1/17/2004 11:21:37 AM
        
        re: 'mornin, Dan ;-) - Justin Kelly - 1/17/2004 6:04:40 PM
        
        Oh, boy, a real CAVE? - Nick Hoffman - 1/21/2004 1:19:59 AM
        
        "searchable message history..." - Tom Brosz - 1/17/2004 10:34:03 PM
    - re: Couldn't this wasted energy have been spent modernizing your html? - SDG - 1/16/2004 12:26:44 AM
- An observation and my vote - alcaray - 1/14/2004 11:55:43 PM
- the real issue is this - R.L. - 1/14/2004 7:33:34 AM
  - Why be so self-important, truth-denying, competitive prizes-HATING and downright misleading? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/14/2004 6:12:54 PM
    - You would be humorous if you werent such an inane loser.... - R.L. - 1/15/2004 3:54:25 AM
      - Here's a very serious question for you, "R.L."... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 4:41:39 AM
        
        Please note : Rich did not address a single point I raised - R.L. - 1/15/2004 5:12:15 AM
        
        You've never addressed my points with intellectual integrity, so why should I bother with your umpteenth question? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 6:00:09 AM
        
        Why are you so obsessed with my picture? - R.L. - 1/15/2004 7:34:28 PM
        
        You are to be taken seriously? - R.L. - 1/15/2004 8:33:35 AM
        
        Actually, I did- You can't read... - R.L. - 1/15/2004 6:27:45 AM
        
        NASA vs. NSF: Bush apparently touted an NSF achievement when praising NASA yesterday! - SpaceProjects.com - 1/15/2004 7:22:38 PM
        
        OINK OINK!!! - Spaceprojects.crap - 1/15/2004 10:49:11 PM
        
        Now you are just lying - R.L. - 1/15/2004 10:33:48 PM
- He should addopt a URL free handle or can his ass. (n/t) - et - 1/12/2004 6:26:38 PM
  - Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 8:16:34 PM
    - Ok then. - et - 1/13/2004 6:25:40 PM
      - You fail to see what the health care vs. space expenditures debate has to do with space? WOW. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 7:01:21 PM
        
        Well, he would fit right in Current Events. Jusk keep him out of space please. (n/t) - et - 1/13/2004 7:06:53 PM
        
        Space forum: "This board will include, with loose interpretation: Space Science & Technology, past, present and future; Fiction, History and Politics with regard to space as well as general aviation." - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 7:15:24 PM
        
        Which category does Hillary-bashing fall under? - et - 1/13/2004 9:25:55 PM
        
        Which posting of mine falls under your Hillary-bashing category? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 10:17:39 PM
- re: Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting - Johannes - 1/12/2004 5:20:17 AM
- My feelings on Woodlock, and the spammer.... - R.L. - 1/11/2004 11:12:44 PM
  - R.L. is on the right track - Gary - 1/12/2004 12:59:59 AM
    - Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 1:12:36 AM
      - This has nothing to do with our jobs - R.L. - 1/12/2004 1:52:21 AM
        
        Ditto (n/t) - Gary - 1/12/2004 4:12:57 AM
        
        Â¿Et tu, Gary? :-) I STILL wish Beagle 2 had succeeded and outshined NASA, though... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 4:51:15 AM
        
        So you receive tax dollars, but your resentfulness of me has NOTHING to do with my pro-entrepreneurial stance... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/12/2004 2:54:29 AM
        
        You bumbling moron- you made a fool of yourself, you spamming annoyance... - R.L. - 1/13/2004 5:01:07 AM
        
        Why do you think I'm against govt. funding (which you admit to desperately needing, by the way)? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 6:17:15 AM
        
        Either you did not read what I said, or you are too stupid to understand it... - R.L. - 1/13/2004 6:42:03 AM
        
        Your repeatedly groundless insults suggest you have good reason to fear a meritocracy's emergence in govt. procurement. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 3:27:39 PM
        
        You cant read - R.L. - 1/13/2004 8:14:21 PM
        
        You can't write... - SpaceProjects.com - 1/13/2004 10:11:29 PM
        
        one last time for the insane spammer - R.L. - 1/14/2004 5:07:41 AM
        
        You lack intellectual integrity, are manic, and deserve the Darwin award. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/14/2004 6:03:23 PM
  - The use of a 100% NONcommercial handle minimizes the potential for (often misinformed) ad hominem attacks. - SpaceProjects.com - 1/11/2004 11:45:48 PM
- Ban him -- He's spam and nothing more (n/t) - Gary - 1/11/2004 6:13:58 PM
  - And presumably your THREE (n/t) postings in this lone thread somehow are NOT spam? - SpaceProjects.com - 1/11/2004 10:16:13 PM
    - re: As amazing as it may seem to you -- no, they are not . . . (n/t) - D. Spires - 1/17/2004 10:59:35 AM
- No - Mark Eby - 1/11/2004 4:52:22 PM
- No - Buck Galaxy - 1/11/2004 4:41:13 PM
- Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more. - SOCRATES(?) / SpaceProjects.com - 1/11/2004 2:49:58 PM
  - re: Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more. - fuck you - 2/13/2004 3:44:11 AM
  - I rest my case (n/t) - Gary - 1/11/2004 6:17:09 PM
- re: You held a similar discussion about me a while back - Success_Machine - 1/11/2004 2:43:15 PM
  - You didn't spam the HZ (n/t) - Gary - 1/11/2004 6:19:08 PM
    - re: I use HZ to present my ideas. - Success_Machine - 1/12/2004 2:07:49 PM
  - Abstain - Fox - 1/11/2004 3:59:13 PM
    - RE: open question - SDG - 1/12/2004 8:29:12 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (61 posts)