SpaceProjects.com is 100% NONcommercial, and its urls merely support assertions that are being made. That way, related posts need not be nearly as lengthy. If my postings were merely about advertising, I'd not spend so much time in a BBS with merely a dozen or so users. I'd simply use one of those e-mail programs and really send spam everywhere (especially in Europe, where space socialism's still not impenetrable). OR I'd invest my time financially more productively, and take the proceeds to buy Google ads.
The reason a handle is preferred over a name is that some in this forum love ignoring the message and instead attacking the messenger. I discovered this forum through an ad hominem (and inaccurate) attack about me personally, and I prefer to use the handle. Inaccuracies abound when ad hominem attacks are waged against my pro-entrepreneurial analyses.
For instance, you just posted that I'm an "ignorant little freak". In fact, though, I'm an attorney who graduated from a Top Ten law school, who started on his high school's conference championship-winning football team (where he was also the first wrestling state finalist in school history), and whose photo's in the high school yearbook's senior superlatives section for being elected the "Biggest Ladies Man". Yet I'm a "little freak"? Meanwhile, although I don't think I'm ignorant, I do admit to seeking more knowledge in the high tech. realm, and this place is sometimes helfpul. I also admit to being unique...considering how not too many D.C. lawyers would donate as much time as I do to the volunteer cause of trying to liberate space entrepreneurs from this town's bureaucratic jealousy and corrupt contractors' resentfulness of potential competitors.
As your posting about me suggests that "ignorant" may very well fit others in this forum more than it fits me, perhaps you might want to look at where your other three fingers point when your index is aimed in my direction.
Flame » in reply to My feelings on Woodlock, and the spammer....
The use of a 100% NONcommercial handle minimizes the potential for (often misinformed) ad hominem attacks.
The whole thread (61 posts)
- Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- Boy, this sure turned out to be a mature discussion of the issue, didn't it? (n/t)
- Ok, heres what I will do
- An observation and my vote
- the real issue is this
- Why be so self-important, truth-denying, competitive prizes-HATING and downright misleading?
- He should addopt a URL free handle or can his ass. (n/t)
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- Ok then.
- You fail to see what the health care vs. space expenditures debate has to do with space? WOW.
- Ok then.
- Even as your profanity, misspelling and (n/t) are fine?
- re: Rich/spaceprojects.com, status of posting
- My feelings on Woodlock, and the spammer....
- R.L. is on the right track
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Ditto (n/t)
- So you receive tax dollars, but your resentfulness of me has NOTHING to do with my pro-entrepreneurial stance...
- This has nothing to do with our jobs
- Gary, by any chance do you receive tax dollars for a living?
- The use of a 100% NONcommercial handle minimizes the potential for (often misinformed) ad hominem attacks.
- R.L. is on the right track
- Ban him -- He's spam and nothing more (n/t)
- No
- No
- Why censor reform proposals and their justifications? Sure, pro-entrepreneurial reforms could displace some, but they could empower many far more.
- re: You held a similar discussion about me a while back