But this thread is about how nonscientists routinely misunderstand the difference. On the one hand we have Creationists thinking that they can force science at gunpoint to support their religious beliefs. On the other, as I wrote in some words to DFM, pro-science non-scientists have a faith in science. Few people make an actual religion out of science; New Guinea Cargo Cults, maybe. But people in general do view science in a way that has religious overtones. (And dude, that's a good thing for science, on balance. Look at the other half of the population with a superstitious dread of science. Which way is pragmatically better? Which way keeps those grants coming?)
Professionals in both camps generally seem able to maintain the distinction. But this thread wouldn't exist if the non-professional masses didn't keep screwing it up.
Current Events » in reply to Science and religion are not at all the same thing
That's quite true
The whole thread (104 posts)
- Bush loses remaining mind
- Scott's post on Space about God and Physicists reminded me of something
- Evolution.
- Gotta fall in with the "bad idea" crowd....
- Didn't Einstein say....
- re:Have you ever read the beginning of the Bible and
- Don't forget the Founding Fathers and Declaration of Independence
- BDS?
- What exactly is intelligent design?
- "Intelligent Design" is just "Creation Science" dressed up in a suit and tie. (n/t)
- Why is there this need for religion to masquerade as science?
- "Intelligent Design" is just "Creation Science" dressed up in a suit and tie. (n/t)
- Very BAD decision. (n/t)
- Were the universe intelligently designed..............
- re: Bush loses remaining mind
- Is anyone really surprised by this? (n/t)
- He's a very dangerous man
- This is one of the reasons why I'm still a Democrat
- From the full transcript
