Can I be sure that life started on Earth?
"Certainty is not what Science is about. Right now it is by far the most probably hypothesis. This is a borderline area where progress is slow because of the vast barrier of time between the beginning of life and today."
And evidence of life on Earth 3.9 billion years ago could be part of this slow progress?
It seems to me that somone arguing for Intelligent Design is going the mention that evidence of life can be found in the oldest of Earth's rocks, and is going be refering to an old earth, compared to the "creationists" who seem to talk about a young Earth thousands of years old.
I think we can dismiss the idea that life began as simple chemical reaction, unless we include in the definition of simple, an *unknown* chemical reaction.
"Simple life" is yet to be created by scientists. We have yet to create anything which could be called synthetic life. A lifeless world is unlikely to create a hair dryer, 747 airplane, button, or a nylon sock but somehow it's suppose to create something beyond our present capability.
Current Events » in reply to Answers:
re: Answers:
The whole thread (104 posts)
- Bush loses remaining mind
- Scott's post on Space about God and Physicists reminded me of something
- Evolution.
- Gotta fall in with the "bad idea" crowd....
- Didn't Einstein say....
- re:Have you ever read the beginning of the Bible and
- Don't forget the Founding Fathers and Declaration of Independence
- BDS?
- What exactly is intelligent design?
- "Intelligent Design" is just "Creation Science" dressed up in a suit and tie. (n/t)
- Why is there this need for religion to masquerade as science?
- "Intelligent Design" is just "Creation Science" dressed up in a suit and tie. (n/t)
- Very BAD decision. (n/t)
- Were the universe intelligently designed..............
- re: Bush loses remaining mind
- Is anyone really surprised by this? (n/t)
- He's a very dangerous man
- This is one of the reasons why I'm still a Democrat
- From the full transcript
