No... I don't think he believes his nonsense- it may be nice to give some people the benifit of the doubt, but Hoagland is most definitely a charlatan- he has been caught in too many lies. Like his claim to have won the 'Angstrom medal'.... (Remember, I actually wrote the RSAS and posted their response that Hoagland had aquired the medal fraudulently and that they have asked him to return it...)
Sometimes people just lie for profit- remember the faith healer Peter Popoff? Remember the Amazing Randi exposing him and destroying him? The faith healer seemed to really believe his own garbage- but it was shown that he was a fraud knowingly exploiting peoples willingness to believe in miracles. He made millions...
As for other purveyors of nonsense you and I have a long standing semantic argument. I call them liars even if they believe the nonsense they try to sell... You disapprove. I think those that claim, even though there is copius evidence to the contrary, that we never went to the moon are liars. They choose not to learn the facts, which - to me - means they CHOOSE to state untruth.
Flame » in reply to That's not "pathological" skepticism
Hoagland, the one thing you can't say about him is that he doesn't Believe.
The whole thread (109 posts)
- Symptoms of Pathological Skepticism.
- re: Symptoms of Pathological Behaviour (n/t)
- Just for the record:
- No...
- In Defense of Pathological Skepticism.
- That's not "pathological" skepticism
- Hoagland, the one thing you can't say about him is that he doesn't Believe.
- "Semantic"?
- 'Argument by dictonary definition' isn't an argument
- "And there, bunkie, I got ya: My definition of "lie" can be found in a dictionary. Where in the universe did you get yours?"..... Does the Mirriam-Webster dictionary count? You will, of course apolog…
- Yes, Damn it....
- "Semantic"?
- On the other hand...
- Hoagland, the one thing you can't say about him is that he doesn't Believe.
- re: Perhaps you are not a PATHOLOGICAL skeptic.
- Easter has been cancelled this year. They found the body.
- re: Perhaps I was wrong.
- No, I don't concede that.
- re: "Do you concede that UFO's don't necessarily violate any known physical laws?"
- re: Perhaps I was wrong.
- Easter has been cancelled this year. They found the body.
- That's not "pathological" skepticism
- The burden of proof is, as it has always been, on the most extraordinary claims. (n/t)
