I have some information that might make them think in a rational way, but I am torn by the emotion of indecision.
Should I attempt to explain to them what I know or should I let them wallow in ignorance?
I have imagined various outcomes for either decision and either decision could have effects ranging from good to zero to very serious.
The information is in an area that they are somewhat familiar with, so I think that they might understand it, especially if it is explained in manner that they are accustomed to thinking in. (that would not be easy for me, but I could attempt it.)
I know that some of them already think that what I have said in the past is "lunacy" and what I am asking you will reinforce their conviction of that idea, but I need another opinion from a person that has experienced something unexplainable.
The information that I am talking about has to do with the unique propulsion system of a saucer shaped craft.
Do you think that such information presented here would have no effect on anyone or would there be good or bad effects from the knowledge of such information.
Any thoughts on such a subject?
Thanks Johannes
Flame » in reply to Yes, a little more than half
re: Hey Lindy I need your advice
The whole thread (109 posts)
- Symptoms of Pathological Skepticism.
- re: Symptoms of Pathological Behaviour (n/t)
- Just for the record:
- No...
- In Defense of Pathological Skepticism.
- That's not "pathological" skepticism
- Hoagland, the one thing you can't say about him is that he doesn't Believe.
- "Semantic"?
- 'Argument by dictonary definition' isn't an argument
- "And there, bunkie, I got ya: My definition of "lie" can be found in a dictionary. Where in the universe did you get yours?"..... Does the Mirriam-Webster dictionary count? You will, of course apolog…
- Yes, Damn it....
- "Semantic"?
- On the other hand...
- Hoagland, the one thing you can't say about him is that he doesn't Believe.
- re: Perhaps you are not a PATHOLOGICAL skeptic.
- Easter has been cancelled this year. They found the body.
- re: Perhaps I was wrong.
- No, I don't concede that.
- re: "Do you concede that UFO's don't necessarily violate any known physical laws?"
- re: Perhaps I was wrong.
- Easter has been cancelled this year. They found the body.
- That's not "pathological" skepticism
- The burden of proof is, as it has always been, on the most extraordinary claims. (n/t)
